Napoleonic, WSS & ECW wargaming, with a load of old Hooptedoodle on this & that


Monday, 17 June 2024

Siege of Liverpool 1644: Preamble - Quick Scenario Context

 My game of Prince Rupert's Siege of Liverpool is scheduled for tomorrow night. The event was chosen because it is a small siege, which is a good idea for rule-testing, the ECW gives relatively simple sieges, and I have an interest in the area.

Liverpool, in 1644, is a town of only about 1000 inhabitants, with fairly primitive port facilities, but it provides a very useful communication with Ireland. A year ago, Parliament seized the town and ejected the main Catholic families (notably Richard Molyneux, who promptly raised regiments of foot and horse, and went away to fight for the King), and it has subsequently been fortified by the addition of earth walls to protect the north side of the town, the remainder of the approaches being protected naturally by water. Sir John Moore of Bankhall is the Governor, and he has been provided with weapons and men to form a garrison. The town has a number of disgruntled Catholics and others with Royalist sympathies. In my rule system, the place has a Local Support rating of +1 on a scale of -3 to +3, which means they are marginally supportive of the garrison - this being largely helped by recent news of the Massacre of Bolton, at which Prince Rupert and the Earl of Derby allowed the murder of hundreds of civilians who had not been involved in the fighting. The town Mayor is Jacobus Williamson, who may be regarded as an additional officer for the garrison as long as the Local Support rating does not go negative.

 
Map of Liverpool shortly after the siege, with no reference to the works or the walls. The inlet from the river, The Pool, is clearly visible, protecting two sides of the town. At the time of the siege, bridges and ferries over the Pool were removed. The Castle is also visible, and this provided a citadel


 
This is generally regarded as the best view of the siege; it is known as "Mr Leland's Map", and seems to be a Victorian re-hash of a contemporary map, though details of the town itself show a lot of odd mistakes. It is interesting that the ditch around the mudwall may have been flooded from the river. [This will not be the case in my version!]


Rupert's Royalist army is large, and growing in both size and momentum. His mission in the Lancashire area is to capture the port of Liverpool and relieve the siege of Lathom House (near Ormskirk), and to raise more troops for a march to relieve York. His army is easily large enough to take Liverpool, which he describes as a "crows' nest", and he detaches his cavalry and much of the infantry to carry out his other work while the siege proceeds. For all his numerical advantages, Rupert has limited time to get the job done, since he is under pressure to get to York with the biggest force possible, and he also probably has some confidence concerns, since he was heavily criticised for casualties suffered in the capture of Bristol in July 1643.

Rupert arrives about 6th June 1644; the advance guard which seals off the landward approaches to the town is Richard Molyneux's regiment of horse! The main Royalist camp is set up on high ground towards Everton, and work starts on building batteries, and trenches are constructed on the hill overlooking the east side of the town. 

The town is not a formidable objective, but could be costly (some early assaults on the walls are repulsed bloodily and easily, so Rupert is forced to accept that formal bombardment will be necessary), and the town, apart from the natural water defences, cannot be cut off from the river, since Parliament controls the Mersey, thus supply of food and ammunition will not be a problem for the garrison. 

 

11 comments:

  1. A good build up to what will be a fascinating test of the siege rules. Should also be closely fought as the Liverpudlians won't take kindly to a bunch of rowdies coming over from Everton to take over the place!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Rob. The rules are on a heap of odd sheets and scribbles; my intention has been to produce a simple game, so with luck I should remember most of it! In case I spend too much time trying to find things, or amending them and trying again, I have reserved the following evening as well!

      I am reminded of an old friend, Allan Gallacher - much missed - who was one of my chief wargaming influences. He said that sieges were an example of what he called "high diving" games, where the result was predictable; when you dive from a high board the outcome is not in doubt - you are going to hit the water - the points are scored for what you achieve in the brief time before the splash.

      Delete
  2. Good luck to a foreigner called "Rupert" trying to conquer Liverpool.

    It won't happen, matey!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Could go either way. Foreigners are OK - there were loads of foreigners in Liverpool right back to Viking times, but they never had much time for Kings and all that nonsense. I reckon Rupert has more than enough weight to flatten the place - the Royalists made a real mess of Bolton a week earlier - have a squint at

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Storming_of_Bolton

      Legend has it that the massacre was a reprisal for the garrison hanging an Irish prisoner from the walls. I think there may be a useful lesson there for all of us, boys and girls.

      Delete
  3. So does that put Notty Ash inside or outside the works? Only asking out of concern for the diddy men…

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think we are OK - if Knotty Ash existed in the 17th Century, it was about 6 miles east of Liverpool, that's straight across the table, away from the river, over the hills on the way towards Prescot. The open area on the other side of the inlet from Liverpool was known as The Waste, or Liverpool Common, and was very marshy, so it will not see any fighting - in later years the low land was drained, and Toxteth and Aigburth were built, which is my part of the city.

      Delete
  4. Interesting. Looking at that map I see a number of fields with the word 'hey' in the name, which I see means an enclosed field. Not a word used in my neck of the woods. Some seem to be named after people (e.g. Alderman Benn) and others after other places (Kilne or Barn for example). I guess somewhere there was an enclosure where the were Alders.
    The other standout thing is the amount of open space behind the walls. Most of it, bar the original 7 streets and the castle.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There are still lots of places called Hey in Liverpool - Hackins Hey, Hillfoot Hey, Alder Hey. At the top end of Dale Street was the Townend Windmill - it was quite rural really.

      Delete
  5. PS I see also that there is a Tarleton's Field by the castle. One for AWI enthusiasts. They've got to have been Royalists right, or am I show my Roundhead bias?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ah yes - Banestre Tarleton was the son of a wealthy merchant who lived in Aigburth, which is really my home patch. The Tarleton's made great wealth from sugar importation, but the business also shipped slaves in the opposite direction. Tarleton became one of the names which Liverpool Council removed from streets in recent years, as a penance or something. When I was a boy, my faviurite shop was "Hobbies", in Tarleton Street - I think Tarleton St is probably renamed now. Another of the slave-trade families was Penny, but somehow the council stopped short of renaming Penny Lane.

      Delete
  6. For some reason I can only hear Yosser Hughes, in the background "Gizza go on a bow, go on, I could do dat"

    H

    ReplyDelete