Napoleonic, WSS & ECW wargaming, with a load of old Hooptedoodle on this & that


Thursday, 6 August 2020

Battle of Espinosa de los Monteros - the Game

Yesterday evening the Espinosa game was duly played out here. I was umpire (I feel that I was somehow born to be an umpire - it's a role I enjoy greatly), and the visiting generals for the occasion were Dave and - erm - Dave. Dave took the role of Joachim Blake, in command of the Spanish army, and Dave was Marshal Victor. Since this is all too much for a bear of little brain, I was pleased to adopt forms of address suggested by the visitors, derived from ancient British TV sitcoms - Marshal Victor (whose real name was Claude Perrin) became Reggie Perrin, of course (otherwise known as Vic of Belluno), and General Blake was "Blakey" - so that was much more comfortable all round.

Blakey
Perrin
The battle involved a minimal cavalry presence - both armies had just two light cavalry units tucked away at the back, but both the commanders threw their cavalry forward, which was a much more exciting start than I had expected.

The Spanish position on their right looked a bit suspect, having a river at their backs, but the ground was quite favourable, with hills and woods offering some advantages in defence, and this was where all the Spanish artillery was placed. Victor duly left this flank alone, and sent in Lapisse's division, to attack the Spanish left, which had no artillery and included a contingent of rather suspect milicias provinciales. The militia boys did rather well, considering, and after some early reverses they managed to drive Lapisse's force back, but it was only a temporary breather.

The narrative should become sort of apparent from the photos, I hope. One important theme was the heroism of General Blake, who seemed to be determined to die in action, but somehow survived. Another theme was that the Spanish artillery was ineffective throughout - that load of cheap gunpowder they got from the Gomez brothers was probably not a good idea. The Spaniards, under the house rules, are in real trouble if they attempt to move and fight at the same time, and the weak cavalry units are a problem.

Having said all of which, both generals conducted themselves very well, the battle was interesting (at least the umpire found it so!), and, though the final score in Victory Points was 8-2 to the French, General Blake comes out of the episode with some personal credit, certainly for his skill at getting in the press coverage. Marshal Victor, of course, won, which is what it's all about in Napoleon's army.

My thanks to my visiting generals for their good humour and enthusiasm, and for surviving an embarrasing collapse of our rural broadband which knocked Zoom out for 5 minutes or so!

Early view from behind the Spanish left and centre - the fighting on the ridge on the left is in a bit of a lull, but - yes - that's General Blake on the right edge of the picture, taking personal command of the cavalry. His staff were overcome with horror. The black square marker next to a French regiment indicates that they are in square (good eh?).
Again, from behind the Spanish lines - this time just to the right of centre - here you see the Spanish artillery, whose performance was - how do you say? - disappointing. The French were very circumspect about attacking this part of the line.
General Blake again, posing for the camera with the Cazadores de Olivenza. This figure, by the way, is an OOP Falcata, and was (whisper it) actually painted by Hermogenes, the man who founded Falcata. There are few known examples of evidence of Hermogenes having actually done something, so this is a rarity indeed. Yes, General Blake does look like Brendan Rodgers - in which role he is almost certainly proud of the spirit and character of his team, who were thrashed again...
More of the same - the French cavalry in the background are obviously intending to do something about this, and this area of the battlefield became a little hectic for a while.
The Spanish cavalry, rather reduced in numbers, pull back for a rest.
At this stage, the French are leading 4-1 - there is a lot of space between the Spanish left and centre, and Victor's men are coming forward.
From the French view - town of Espinosa in the background. Having been forced to give up his spell as a cavalry commander, Blake has now taken command of a battalion of line infantry.
From above the Spanish centre, looking left - yes, Blake is at it again, this time leading the infantry forward.
Still the Spanish artillery have only scored a single hit on the infantry opposite, but the grenadiers in the wood, with a stunning volley of musketry, have done some damage to the French battery on the road.
General view, looking toward the Spanish left flank. By this stage, the game was almost over - the Spanish had lost enough infantry on their left flank, plus their cavalry, to get the score up to 7-2. Then, a final attack on the right by some Spanish light infantry ran into very heavy opposition, and the battle was over - 8-2 to Victor.

This is what remained of the Spanish left at the end - view from behind Lapisse's position.
Coup de grace (French for "lawn-mower") - The Freitag battalion (1/26eme - centre foreground) emerged from the woods at the end to rout the Spanish lights and clinch the victory. Job done.



30 comments:

  1. Hoorah for the Freitag Battalion delivering the coup de grace! Always an enjoyable battle report from you,Tony. Well done!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Jon - my "visitors" showed commendable fortitude, so I barged through the technical problems - even via Zoom, synergy helps a lot! Your boys done exceptional, as they used to say on the Scottish football reports.

      Delete
  2. Looks a dab game Tony. I do like your scoreboard too!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Ray - the scoreboard took some effort to acquire (and then I had to eliminate the woodworm...). I don't suppose you know anyone who would like to buy a locked-down billiard hall? No? Could be a bargain.

      Delete
    2. Oh yes - the billiard hall is in Chesterfield.

      Delete
  3. G'Day Tony, curse those Gomez brothers! I believe they also have a large quantity of rubber bayonets they are trying to shift! A very neat game, I like the whole Command and Colours layout - excellent. Cheers Greg

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Greg - I suspect the Gomez brothers built my garage...

      Delete
  4. You clearly have this Zoom business down to a fine art now Tony. Troops and table excellent as always and of course it's always good to see another shot of that scoreboard.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Zoom business was playing up a bit this time, Lee, but generally it has worked well. I've been aware of Ross McF and Conrad Kinch and a few others playing games via videoconference for some years, and I've been talking to a few people for a while about doing something, but I had to wait for a pandemic for me to get going! If I get going on Field of Battle Ver.3, the scoreboard may get to record some rather larger numbers!

      Delete
  5. As always, a great looking game Tony...

    Didn’t Harry Pearson write that a third of all wargamers are called Dave...

    All the best. Aly

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's right - it must be an age thing. I was mentioning to my wife something about a friend of mine named Dennis, and she said it's obvious that Dennis must be an elderly chap, since no-one is named Dennis now. A bit of a generalisation, but there is a point there somewhere. I was thinking of changing my own name to Jadon - what do you think?

      Delete
  6. Harry Pearson, in his acknowledgements at the end of 'Achtung Schweinehund!' thanks a long list of fellow gamers "and several dozen blokes named Dave".
    Anyway, as one of the Daves in this case, thank you very much, Tony! It was a great game and lovely to 'meet' you, albeit remotely. Maybe I was a bit on the rash side as 'Blakey' (at least two units wiped out under me), but I was determined to go down fighting! My congratulations to the worthy victor, Victor. Those artillery officers have surely been cashiered, meanwhile..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Absolutely my pleasure, sir - an honour and a privilege. Rash is good - it's only a damned game, after all - but those artillery chaps do need a talking to.

      Delete
  7. As Marshall Vic I can confirm that it was a thoroughly enjoyable evening's gaming, and I am delighted to have been able to take part in one of Tony's games which hitherto I have only been able to admire from afar via viewing the blog.

    One other thing I can report is that General Lapisse has now earned the ironic nickname Mr Motivator from his derisive peers and has given up on his dream of becoming a life coach, having miserably failed umpteen rally attempts on his unit before giving up and sulking through the rest of the battle.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ah yes - I forgot to mention M. Lapisse's calamitous rally attempts (it wasn't just that the boys didn't rally, it was the fact that he usually rolled a 1 - maybe that should be an extra hit?). As we discussed, he'd obviously prepared the wrong speech. Could he make it as an influencer on Instagram?

      Delete
    2. I think the Rally rule is maybe too difficult - perhaps 4, 5 or 6 would be more reasonable if a general is present, 5 or 6 if they are in cover, 6 otherwise. Hmmm.....

      Delete
    3. I think in the vanilla game you can only rally when you have the right card, you get a number of dice equal to your command cards and you have to roll the right symbols for the unit type you are trying to rally. So in Ramekin you get more attempts but each attempt is less likely to succeed. Perhaps you could use the C&C dice in the same way, roll a number of dice corresponding to the number of blocks the unit has left, +1 for a general, and only one attempt allowed per turn..? It will take some tweaking to find a happy medium I guess.

      Delete
    4. Yes - that sounds promising - thanks for that.

      Delete
  8. Coup de grace! I’m having that one for my Dad Joke collection.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Sort of a French version of the Uxbridge English Dictionary

    ReplyDelete
  10. It does take a certain degree of moral fibre to agree to lead a Spanish army against Napoleonic French, or hubris....

    Still, an enjoyable post and very pretty pictures!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you Ross - the French rather sneakily avoided the better Spanish troops and picked on the weaker flank - underhand behaviour?

      Delete
    2. The other Dave has Napoleon for his profile picture,so he was always going to be the French.. we gave them pause early on, and it was great fun anyway!

      Delete
    3. The whole matter of "hubris" is interesting. I guess the original General Blake was merely a patriot, or something equally ill-advised. Certainly the Spanish army had a difficult time against the French back in the old Guerra de la Independencia, but - for a complex of reasons - 7 years after the Battle of Espinosa the French Empire was no more, and its Emperor was (allegedly) being poisoned on St Helena. In the end, the Spaniards did all right - they suffered and bled for it, and they earned it.

      Independencia.

      For those of us brought up with Napier's categorisation of the Spanish nation as cowardly, untrustworthy and probably malodorous, it is far easier to fall back on our received stereotypes. I have lost count of the number of times I have been asked how I can be bothered having a miniature Spanish Napoleonic army? The implication is that, since such an army is going to get beaten, where's the fun in that? Why don't I have a French army consisting entirely of the Imperial Guard? That's more like it, surely?

      Well, maybe. To demonstrate the extent of my weirdness (masochism?), I actually have TWO Napoleonic Spanish armies - one dressed for 1808/9 and one for 1812 - so ponder that, chaps. I also have a large French army, of course, but that's by the bye. I have found the history and the organisation of the Spanish army to be a fascinating study, and my games involving them are invariably both interesting and entertaining, so I have no complaints at all. If anyone is offended by my poor focus on the need to win then I suggest that they go and play marbles with the rest of the class. I have had endless fun and many hours of absorption playing with my untrustworthy Spaniards.

      Delete
    4. I think the temptation to go for the more glamorous armies/units has always been a strong one among us wargamers. When I started building up my army of minifigs as a kid in the 70s it was as a result of the Waterloo film so of course I had to have the Old Guard and the Prussian Guards Grenadiers and all that, and it never once occurred to me that the Old Guard were extremely unlikely to ever get involved in battles of the scale I was going to be able to fight with my few hundreds of figures. I can see the attraction of the less visited armies, and I am impressed by the dedication that has led you to accumulate Spanish armies to represent different stages of the war. I am aware of many of the developments in uniforms and organisation of the French army during this period, but of the Spanish, not so much.

      The cliché of the useless cowardly Spanish is as persistent as the one about the useless cowardly Italian in World War II, and about as valid. I would imagine that man to man the Spanish soldier was very much a match for his opponents in terms of courage and resolution (possibly more so as the French armies in Spain presumably never had the pick of the better troops over the Grande Armee?); like you say, the fact that they continued to fight after repeated defeats, and that the guerrillas continued to fight even though this might well involve seeing their villages destroyed and their families massacred, showed that there was no lack of bravery or determination. They did indeed earn their victory.

      As a Napoleon-worshipping lad I was always a lot less interested in the Peninsular War, partly because Napoleon was mostly absent and also partly I think because the battles seemed somehow inconsequential, as opposed to Napoleon’s campaigns which would mostly end in a climactic decisive battle. These days of course I find there’s a great deal of interest in the Peninsular campaigns and their effect upon the greater picture. Some of the features that made the war so distinct from those of the Emperor are what make it so fascinating now. As an example, that confused French command structure that in effect seemed to make the French marshals in Spain a law unto themselves and saw Marshall Soult governing Andalusia almost as his own personal fiefdom, was something quite extraordinary and so clearly unwise that it‘s hard to believe that someone as intelligent as Napoleon could leave the arrangement in place – though I think I understand at least some of the reasons why he did.

      A propos of nothing I was reminded for some reason of a book I read some years ago called the Prisoners of Cabrera. It’s the fascinating and sometimes harrowing story of the fate of the French and allied soldiers who fell into the hands of the Spanish after Dupont surrendered his command at Bailen. It’s a largely untold story of the Peninsular War and you might find it of some interest. I would have offered to lend you my copy but I leant it to someone else and never got it back!

      Delete
    5. Thanks for that, Dave (Vic). I found a used copy of the book online, so have ordered it. The Spaniards appear to have a traditional streak of cruelty - possibly connected with their close association with the Arab world for so many centuries? - but it is alarming how little time Napoleon had for his soldiers who were defeated. I read about the Garde de Paris, who were captured at Bailen, and just about died to a man in the hulks at Cadiz. The regiment was reformed, of course (I have a battalion in The Cupboard!), but they were never issued with a replacement eagle - Napoleon never forgot regiments who lost their eagles.

      Delete
  11. Great looking game and report. Blake is One of my favourite Generals and this battle is a tough one for the Spanish ( but there again which battle isn’t tough for the Spanish.? ) You’re certainly becoming professional at this zoom malarkey - you’ll be taking bookings next

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Graham - you a Zoom man? If so we could set something up if you fancy it (but not in a blog comment...)

      Delete