I would be embarrassed to be seen to offer
up another me-too tribute - it's an activity I disapprove of. Private feelings
are nicer and somehow more sincere when they remain private.
I am reminded by yesterday's news of the
passing of Chuck Berry that - rather to my surprise, in the long run - he was a
sort of hero of mine. Someone who made my life a little richer, in the
influence he wielded as much as by his own work.
Already the media are wheeling out all
sorts of has-beens from show business to make over-inflated utterances about
pop music as Great Art, and all that. I really wouldn't know, and would
hesitate to attempt an academic assessment.
Berry is especially significant for what he
represents. A black man from St Louis, he began recording for Chess Records in
the mid 1950s. Chess, bear in mind, were a specialist blues label who published
artists like Muddy Waters, Willie Dixon and Bo Diddley - primarily for black
audiences - and a worse fit than Berry with the accepted marketed image of the popular music world of the day is hard to imagine. The spending power of the
record-buying teenager was a new phenomenon, and major record labels in the US
were struggling to push coiffed, sterilised, parent-approved products such as
Johnny Tillotson, Fabian and similar - white, acceptable to the church, not
overtly masculine. He was surprisingly old, too - if I recall correctly, his
first commercial success, Maybelline,
was released in 1955, when he was 29. That is positively ancient.
He was not an admirable character, in many
ways. He had spells in prison - notably for tax evasion and (once) for
statutory rape (a charge which looks a bit like police entrapment, all these
years later). He is famous for being difficult to deal with, complicated,
devious. I read his autobiography some years ago and was disappointed - it wasn't
a great read, overall, and he came across as an unusually self-obsessed character.
I suspect that I wouldn't have warmed to the great man's company. I saw him
once, live - he was excellent, a consummate showman, but he was accompanied by a disappointing English tour-band
which did nothing for him at all.
There is a definite thread of racism
through many of the bad breaks which he suffered - especially in the early
years, though his combative personality cannot have helped. He came through a
hard school. I read that in the dance-halls and the provincial theatres he got
into the habit of threading his guitar lead through the handle of his guitar
case before plugging into his amplifier - thus making it impossible for anyone
to steal the case without the matter coming to his attention. He also would not
play until someone put actual cash into his hand. Incongruously, he still
insisted on these technical safeguards when he was appearing at the Paris
Olympia - a quirk which is not without a certain rough charm.
It would be wrong to claim that his records
were history-changers in their own right - famously, he was very fortunate in
that his music impressed the Beatles and the Rolling Stones and the (white) rock
bands that swept to power in the 1960s. Without that connection, Berry and a
lot of his contemporaries would probably have disappeared without trace decades
ago. This has all been much-discussed in the past - however it worked, it
worked. I love him because of the unpretentious nature of the music (though he
did tend to release thinly-disguised rehashes of his earlier successes), and
his cute, street-poet lyrics, which offer an interesting social history of
American youth.
This is getting close to a tribute, and I
wouldn't want that.
Thanks, Chuck. That's really all I wanted
to say.










