In this post I've also included previews of some more of the optional rules I propose to add, firstly the procedure for General's Personalities, which is a prerequisite for the Command rules, and which sets an Ability Rating (compliance/initiative, really) and a Leadership Style, which ranges from Cautious to Aggressive.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiea943SsNWV42zjzBNRYe_AcllNclrBjQ3sjSIS_6aGL56-geK5-lu90s_t67O4NFq1YHa9OXUbQyTI0b5LFRMHPCd9rIFIP1-1p3hbyW5C4H5jYsW2IB-TfZs3UUtVbuwuScDkiQl68Y/s320/MEP+Generals+Personalities.jpg)
And then there are the Command Rules themselves - as previously mentioned, these are supposed to be as minimalist as I can get away with - please forgive any lack of elegance here! In my original notes, these are described as "Command Hassles", which kind of sums up the approach.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhzzx6df7_JqOpSfTm-qyPEdK8Zwl9uQNcxg_Y2JYtTz2ySgzhr-lbPiGnguOU_bnttY0ipPwAqr82fjn2ko696oZIcQkw7GcbPMe7OIPRFoS-aQv5uxuuHy4hMuUeGTLXiQ1zsPosOxSs/s320/MEP+Command+1.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgQaBjLNCpRLn0ia6fVEnZoDfLj0WuU-1BeqMezifTqip3o3EGa-UE9CNarNADdiLLND_EPzVbLKHYjQ7mpnqOHr-koekrRVYbfayNpubAdZOUh7EDJfYlNjPql_Svwqb1e9vKDJpsSIjw/s320/MEP+Command+2.jpg)
As ever, I would be delighted to receive comments on these - this is, after all, supposed to be a working draft.
Correction - section (i) [that's i for idiot, not a Roman 1) in the Command rules is a hangover from an earlier version, and shouldn't be there - I'll clean it up when it goes into the proper draft.
ReplyDeleteTony