The next thing to do is to get the 3rd Divn of Lefebvre's (Bavarian) VII Corps of 1809 finished off. I still need two infantry brigadiers, a brigade of cavalry (2 regts - one of dragoons, one of chevauxlegers - plus a brigadier) and two artillery batteries (including one of Light Artillery). That will be the main components - I can add sappers/engineers and limber teams as time permits.
I may have posted pictures of some of this stuff already. Here are the raw materials for the next steps. The cavalry will all be Hinton Hunt based, and the artillery equipment will be Franznap - for gunners I have a choice of SHQ or Franznap.
The cavalry figures set out here are (L to R) an original HH Chevauxlegers trooper, then conversions produced by Wellington Man of a Chevauxlegers officer and trumpeter, and a dragoon trooper (different-shaped shabraque). I am still doing some experimentation for the command figures for the dragoon unit, but the most likely solution at present is SHQ French line lancer command figures, with HH heads and with the uniform detail re-carved as necessary, mounted on 20mm Garrison horses - we'll see how that goes.
The artillery figures are (L to R) two SHQ figures and three Franznap. Though a good height match, you can see that the Franznap figures are slimmer, and I'll avoid mixing the two breeds in any one unit, though the different makes can co-exist on the table in separate units, I think.
Interestingly, Franznap only make gun crews for the Light Artillery, which brought me back with a bump to the small matter of how the Light and Heavy(?) artillery differed. I have not had a great deal of help on this from the better known modern sources, but in fact it's all OK. The Bavarians did eventually have horse artillery, in the French style, but in 1809 the Light Artillery was simply artillery who were equipped with - erm - lighter guns (6pdrs), and the gunners had a tendency to ride around on those splendid Wurstwagen things. Uniforms? - no real difference, as far as I can tell. So that simplifies matters a bit - I might think about getting a Franznap Wurstwagen - sounds like Phase 1(c) to me.
At risk of sounding like the Golden Globes, I thought I'd mention a few people without whose help I couldn't have made the progress I managed to date - not even close, in fact. Flipping back through this blog, I see a first mention of a possible Bavarian contingent in my State of the Union report in August 2017. By 2nd April last year I was experimenting with preparing some Der Kriegsspieler castings for the first infantry. This week I have 10 battalions ready to fight - I'm really pleased with that. For help with sourcing figures, painting, encouragement, consultancy, charitable donations of effort and castings I have to acknowledge sincere thanks to Evan, Stryker, Ian P, Aulus Grammaticus, Goya, David M, David Y, Old John, Matthew, Uwe and Andreas (die Spielzeugmacher, or Brothers Grimm) and to Chuck Gibke in the US for his knowledge of the old DK ranges. If I've forgotten to mention you, then you know I'm grateful anyway - in particular Jonathan, Lee, Peter A, Ray, Aly, Ross and those others who have egged me on by making encouraging comments as the troops appeared.
Thanks very much!
Napoleonic & ECW wargaming, with a load of old Hooptedoodle on this & that
Tuesday, 29 January 2019
Monday, 28 January 2019
Bavarians - 3rd Divn Infantry now complete
| Bavarian 10. LIR "Junker" |
| 1st Battalion - that'll be Oberstleutnant Von Poellnitz on the cuddy |
| 2nd Battalion |
And because it seemed a suitable occasion, here's a picture of all the finished infantry - here you see General Deroy, with the 5th (Buttler) and 7th (Gunther) Light Bns, and the 9th (Ysenburg), 10th (Junker), 5th (Von Preysing) and 14th Line Regts, all the line units being of two battalions.
| Deroy with the infantry of 3rd Divn, VII Corps, all ready for the Danube campaign |
Wednesday, 16 January 2019
Battle of Aspern-Essling (Day 1) - 21 May 1809
Wargaming yesterday - early start to get to Schloss Goya for 10am kick-off. My idea that it would be amusing to arrive with fresh custard tarts was stillborn, since I couldn't obtain any. No matter, in fact, since our host laid on the customary excellent food and refreshments.
Our game was the Commands & Colors: Napoleonics official scenario for Day 1 of the Battle of Aspern-Essling, which I guess is just the Battle of Aspern, when Massena attempted to hang on to the town, waiting for the bulk of Napoleon's army to hurry up and cross the Danube; thus the French have IV Corps plus some of the reserve cavalry. Lannes and all that stuff belongs to the second day. One big advantage of Day 1 is that it is small enough to make a good-sized game, though the number of built-up areas promised to give the beta-test Ramekin rules [I'm up to version 1.7] a decent workout and sanity-check.
I was Massena, while Goya and Stryker shared the Austrian forces, their overall commander being Archduke Charles. I took along my own French troops, and the Austrian forces were Goya's. We followed the published scenario very closely - the only (insignificant) amendment was that we replaced the mystery French "Guard Heavy Cavalry" unit with a third Cuirassier regiment - it has been suggested to me that whoever designed the scenario identified the Carabiniers as a guard unit - no matter.
Because we stuck to the published set-up, my artillery was mostly stuck in the wrong places. What I should have done was get busy right away with the double-moves which Ramekin allows, to get my artillery better placed. Didn't happen, of course, because I was immediately up to my neck in muck and bullets as the Kaiserliks set about the village.
The big Austrian line units have a scary amount of firepower, and they performed well - their only disadvantages are that they are slow, and are not allowed double moves, though they can certainly get a shift on when they are retiring, since they get double retreats for the C&CN flag symbol rolls. Their distinctive battaillon-masse tactic also proved to be a major discouragement to my late cavalry attack - without horse artillery (or aerial support) there was not much I could do against them.
The Austrians made excellent use, throughout, of the Combined Arms Attack rule, using artillery (including one particularly effective Grand Battery on the little hill north of the village) very effectively to support infantry attacks on the various bits of the town. I took heavy casualties very quickly, and was steadily pushed out of the town - I hung on to the extreme east end of the place, and I held the church for a while, until, again, the Austrians brought up a foot battery and blew me out of there.
So the French were very quickly well behind on Victory Points, including extra ones for possession of the majority of the town, and I only made the margin of defeat anything like respectable with a grand charge of cavalry (historically authentic, by the way) which took out the pesky Grand Battery and wrecked the Austrian cavalry. With everyone beginning to show signs of fatigue, Bellegarde's troops eventually claimed the necessary 12th VP, and the French were beaten [but only until the following day!].
Yes, it was pretty decisive. Once again, my sincere thanks to my colleagues/opponents for their company and good humour, and to Goya for all his hard work organising and setting up, and for slaving in the galley.
***** Late Edit *****
Since the only reaction to this post thus far today has been a couple of emails which indicated that at least two of my readers are confused, I must offer my apologies for a very poor bit of editorial work here. Having thought further about the matter, I confess that I am now a bit confused myself.
To clarify: this is not a description of the first day of a 2-day wargame (I wish it was!), it is a description of a wargame based on the first day of Aspern-Essling, which was a real battle which lasted two days, and my suggestion here that the French might go on to win after two days is not based on history, it merely expresses the French commander's expectation after wargaming the first day's action. After all, the French would probably not have chosen to fight on if they had expected to lose, I guess.
Which brings me to the second point. Was Essling actually a French defeat? I have always believed it to be so - famously so, in fact. Yet Prof De Vries points out (correctly) that Essling was a battle-honour on French Napoleonic battle flags - the 1812 issue of flags showed this honour for a great many regiments. The Professor reckons that the French (like everyone else, he says) only awarded battle honours for victories - the later example of La Moskowa (Borodino) being explained since the French regard it as a victory. Thus, says he, Essling must be another disputed result.
I confess I have always been sort of aware of this apparent paradox, but had managed to avoid thinking it through. I did a quick bit of reading today, and it seems that battle honours were awarded to regiments which performed well at battles commanded by Napoleon himself (which is why you will not find Tarragona, for example). The small matter of whether or not he won was not normally an issue, as we know.
All fine - looks like I learned something I should already have known, and if it turns out that the Professor is mistaken (an event rarer than a Napoleonic defeat) then that is indeed icing on the cake.
*******************
| View over the battlefield, early on, from behind the Austrian left flank |
I was Massena, while Goya and Stryker shared the Austrian forces, their overall commander being Archduke Charles. I took along my own French troops, and the Austrian forces were Goya's. We followed the published scenario very closely - the only (insignificant) amendment was that we replaced the mystery French "Guard Heavy Cavalry" unit with a third Cuirassier regiment - it has been suggested to me that whoever designed the scenario identified the Carabiniers as a guard unit - no matter.
Because we stuck to the published set-up, my artillery was mostly stuck in the wrong places. What I should have done was get busy right away with the double-moves which Ramekin allows, to get my artillery better placed. Didn't happen, of course, because I was immediately up to my neck in muck and bullets as the Kaiserliks set about the village.
The big Austrian line units have a scary amount of firepower, and they performed well - their only disadvantages are that they are slow, and are not allowed double moves, though they can certainly get a shift on when they are retiring, since they get double retreats for the C&CN flag symbol rolls. Their distinctive battaillon-masse tactic also proved to be a major discouragement to my late cavalry attack - without horse artillery (or aerial support) there was not much I could do against them.
The Austrians made excellent use, throughout, of the Combined Arms Attack rule, using artillery (including one particularly effective Grand Battery on the little hill north of the village) very effectively to support infantry attacks on the various bits of the town. I took heavy casualties very quickly, and was steadily pushed out of the town - I hung on to the extreme east end of the place, and I held the church for a while, until, again, the Austrians brought up a foot battery and blew me out of there.
So the French were very quickly well behind on Victory Points, including extra ones for possession of the majority of the town, and I only made the margin of defeat anything like respectable with a grand charge of cavalry (historically authentic, by the way) which took out the pesky Grand Battery and wrecked the Austrian cavalry. With everyone beginning to show signs of fatigue, Bellegarde's troops eventually claimed the necessary 12th VP, and the French were beaten [but only until the following day!].
Yes, it was pretty decisive. Once again, my sincere thanks to my colleagues/opponents for their company and good humour, and to Goya for all his hard work organising and setting up, and for slaving in the galley.
| Already some casualties, but the Archduke isn't hanging about here |
| Grenzer troops and Jaegers - good shooting... |
| Austrians well-established in Aspern |
| French cavalry getting moving on the right flank |
| General Legrand brings up some fresh troops from his division (not easy to find) to try to take back part of the village; they failed, and he himself became a casualty in the attempt |
| Massena still hasn't moved, but he can see that the village is a lost cause - he gets the cavalry advancing on his right flank (far right of the table) |
| Looking from the Austrian right, round about the same stage of the battle |
| But the heavy cavalry had no answer to the battaillon-masse tactics of the Austrian line infantry, so concentrated their attention on the cavalry - this went far better... |
| As D'Espagne's French cuirassiers attack the mounted Austrians, Marulaz brings up the French light cavalry to attack the uhlans on the hill |
| Some things can just be relied on - like death and taxes, the 15eme Chasseurs are always around somewhere |
| The battle is more or less lost, but Molitor attempts to take back part of the village - borrowing the successful Austrian tactic of supporting the infantry with artillery in a Combined Arms attack |
| Situation at the end - the French cavalry have pulled back to avoid the fire of the Austrian infantry. Massena is running out of friends, but he knows Lannes is coming to sort things out tomorrow! |
***** Late Edit *****
Since the only reaction to this post thus far today has been a couple of emails which indicated that at least two of my readers are confused, I must offer my apologies for a very poor bit of editorial work here. Having thought further about the matter, I confess that I am now a bit confused myself.
To clarify: this is not a description of the first day of a 2-day wargame (I wish it was!), it is a description of a wargame based on the first day of Aspern-Essling, which was a real battle which lasted two days, and my suggestion here that the French might go on to win after two days is not based on history, it merely expresses the French commander's expectation after wargaming the first day's action. After all, the French would probably not have chosen to fight on if they had expected to lose, I guess.
Which brings me to the second point. Was Essling actually a French defeat? I have always believed it to be so - famously so, in fact. Yet Prof De Vries points out (correctly) that Essling was a battle-honour on French Napoleonic battle flags - the 1812 issue of flags showed this honour for a great many regiments. The Professor reckons that the French (like everyone else, he says) only awarded battle honours for victories - the later example of La Moskowa (Borodino) being explained since the French regard it as a victory. Thus, says he, Essling must be another disputed result.
I confess I have always been sort of aware of this apparent paradox, but had managed to avoid thinking it through. I did a quick bit of reading today, and it seems that battle honours were awarded to regiments which performed well at battles commanded by Napoleon himself (which is why you will not find Tarragona, for example). The small matter of whether or not he won was not normally an issue, as we know.
All fine - looks like I learned something I should already have known, and if it turns out that the Professor is mistaken (an event rarer than a Napoleonic defeat) then that is indeed icing on the cake.
*******************
Saturday, 12 January 2019
Hooptedoodle #321 - Paint Pots and Pies
Today I went into Edinburgh to visit a family member who is in hospital - he's had a long spell in there thus far, and it is likely to continue for a while. I took the train in (which means they were running today, obviously) and, since I was a bit early for 2pm visiting, I decided to go via the Tollcross area, and visit the Wonderland model shop. It was a decent sort of day, if a bit cold, so I walked fairly briskly from Waverley Station to Tollcross. Better and better. Makes it feel a bit less self-indulgent.
I enjoyed my visit to Wonderland, of course, though I didn't buy anything while I was there. I am rather annoyed to admit that I couldn't remember what it was I'd wanted to get! This must be an age thing, I guess - regularly, when I'm painting, I suddenly realise I could do with a pot of such-and-such a colour, and since Wonderland is my only local Vallejo stockist, I add the required shade to my mental shopping list. Well, chaps, the bad news is that mental shopping lists are no longer enough - for the second such visit in the last few months I found myself staring at the Vallejo racks with no recollection of what it was I'd wanted. Yes - agreed - written lists from now on.
On the way up to the hospital (still walking) I decided to get some small offering of biscuits or similar. The relative in question would really not appreciate grapes or anything healthy, in fact he might even throw them at me. So I found myself looking in the window of what I would term a "traditional" baker's shop. There, in the front, they had a tray of individual custard tarts, such as I have neither seen nor thought about in maybe 30 years. I am very partial to all sorts of cakes and buns, I must admit, but my all-time favourites are probably a bit poncey - I'm very fond of religieuses, sachertorte - stuff like that. Custard tarts do not normally feature in my hit parade.
However, there they were. A British Standard custard tart is a pretty solid fellow - egg custard in a soggy shortcrust case - the filling is commonly topped with grated nutmeg (probably to make it taste of something), though this is less popular in Scotland. I must have eaten quite a few in my time, but none of them was great, I think, and they were all a long time ago. Maybe they are still around, and in great demand, but my perception is that cakes from the supermarket these days tend to be packets of individually wrapped brioche buns with chocolate chips, or 5-in-pack "fresh-baked" cookies with embedded white chocolate bits, made with so much cheap sugar and palm oil that your face feels hot and your breathing gets muffled. Something has shifted - the global village does not seem to offer much in the way of a proper custard tart. This must be progress.
I bought a bag of doughnuts and went off for my visit.
It was only on the train later, coming home, that I started thinking about custard tarts. Hmmm....
I never really liked them, and I'm sure I still don't, but I'm going to have to get some just to prove it. You know how these things gnaw at you?
I enjoyed my visit to Wonderland, of course, though I didn't buy anything while I was there. I am rather annoyed to admit that I couldn't remember what it was I'd wanted to get! This must be an age thing, I guess - regularly, when I'm painting, I suddenly realise I could do with a pot of such-and-such a colour, and since Wonderland is my only local Vallejo stockist, I add the required shade to my mental shopping list. Well, chaps, the bad news is that mental shopping lists are no longer enough - for the second such visit in the last few months I found myself staring at the Vallejo racks with no recollection of what it was I'd wanted. Yes - agreed - written lists from now on.
On the way up to the hospital (still walking) I decided to get some small offering of biscuits or similar. The relative in question would really not appreciate grapes or anything healthy, in fact he might even throw them at me. So I found myself looking in the window of what I would term a "traditional" baker's shop. There, in the front, they had a tray of individual custard tarts, such as I have neither seen nor thought about in maybe 30 years. I am very partial to all sorts of cakes and buns, I must admit, but my all-time favourites are probably a bit poncey - I'm very fond of religieuses, sachertorte - stuff like that. Custard tarts do not normally feature in my hit parade.
However, there they were. A British Standard custard tart is a pretty solid fellow - egg custard in a soggy shortcrust case - the filling is commonly topped with grated nutmeg (probably to make it taste of something), though this is less popular in Scotland. I must have eaten quite a few in my time, but none of them was great, I think, and they were all a long time ago. Maybe they are still around, and in great demand, but my perception is that cakes from the supermarket these days tend to be packets of individually wrapped brioche buns with chocolate chips, or 5-in-pack "fresh-baked" cookies with embedded white chocolate bits, made with so much cheap sugar and palm oil that your face feels hot and your breathing gets muffled. Something has shifted - the global village does not seem to offer much in the way of a proper custard tart. This must be progress.
I bought a bag of doughnuts and went off for my visit.
It was only on the train later, coming home, that I started thinking about custard tarts. Hmmm....
I never really liked them, and I'm sure I still don't, but I'm going to have to get some just to prove it. You know how these things gnaw at you?
Monday, 7 January 2019
Spiritual Support
In my search for 15mm scenery which would suit the Danube campaign, I was disappointed to find that all known previous resin buildings are now OOP - JR Miniatures used to do the Essling Granary and the Aspern Church, as I recall, but no more.
After asking around after a suitable church, I found the best option was an HO model railway church made by Faller, which I obtained online from a supplier in Kiel. I reasoned that a 1/87 model of a small church might just about pass for a 1/100 model of a larger church. When I saw the kit the old heart sank (lots of fiddly bits, optional parts, minimal instructions, glue-in-place stained glass windows, and a general assumption that the user has done this before), but Goya very kindly built it for me, and here it is, with 20mm figures to give a sense of proportion.
There is a plan for a trip up north next week, to fight Day 1 of Aspern, so the church will travel with me. I never go anywhere without a church.
Thanks again, Goya - nice job.
After asking around after a suitable church, I found the best option was an HO model railway church made by Faller, which I obtained online from a supplier in Kiel. I reasoned that a 1/87 model of a small church might just about pass for a 1/100 model of a larger church. When I saw the kit the old heart sank (lots of fiddly bits, optional parts, minimal instructions, glue-in-place stained glass windows, and a general assumption that the user has done this before), but Goya very kindly built it for me, and here it is, with 20mm figures to give a sense of proportion.
There is a plan for a trip up north next week, to fight Day 1 of Aspern, so the church will travel with me. I never go anywhere without a church.
Thanks again, Goya - nice job.
Saturday, 5 January 2019
Hooptedoodle #320 - The Unlikely Tale of Malcolm
I've been thinking about sharing the story
of Uncle Malcolm for a while. I've been hesitant because it's potentially a little
more hazardous than most of the silly yarns you will find here, and also there
are some parts of the story of which I wasn't certain. This last point is a
recurrent problem with the histories of my mother's family, since the
inevitable distortions caused by retelling over the years are supplemented by
the entirely deliberate distortions arising from overstating the achievements
and importance of various family members, and by misrepresenting a lot of stuff
in the interests of the Official Received Family Editions; by mother's family has
more skeletons in cupboards than most. Well, of course, I'm guessing here -
maybe everyone's family is the same?
Prompted by recent sight of an ancient
wedding photo amongst my mum's acccumulated junk (sorry, archives), I decided
to have a bash. Now then - Terms & Conditions:
* Some of the family members involved are
still alive, and I would not like to upset or libel anyone
* Some of what follows will reflect family
traditions and (especially) what I heard from my grandmother, who always
preferred embroidered versions in which she emerged blameless and, if possible,
martyred yet again
* A lot of this is a matter of public
record, though it was a long time ago - if anyone managed to work out, despite
the changed names and dates, the historical version of the story, then they
would almost certainly be mistaken. If necessary, we may take comfort in the
fact that I probably made the whole thing up, to fill a space in my stupid blog.
☐ I have read and accept the
Terms & Conditions
Righto - back to some form of beginning.
From the mid 1930s on, my maternal grandmother lived in the same house in
Liverpool, initially with her four daughters. She and her husband had separated, and the five
of them were a close-knit family, one guiding principle of which was the
untrustworthy and despicable nature of men. In fact, all the daughters
eventually overcame this prejudice long enough to get married, but my Nan and
her cat lived on and nurtured their faith. The only one of her sons-in-law
that she had any time for at all was Barbara's husband, Les, who had the
misfortune (maybe the decency?) to die when he was in his early 40s, and he was
thus himself elevated to the role of tragic martyr, for which Nan always had a
fondness (having suffered herself, of course).
The youngest of the daughters was Belle
(really Anabel). I never really knew her very well - when I was a kiddywink she
sometimes used to come to our house to babysit when my parents went to the
cinema - she was about 12 years older than me, I think. Her early academic
achievements were the pride of the family, and she was certainly a very clever
girl, though the factual history, inevitably, was a bit less prestigious than
the received version. I subsequently learned that she did not, in fact, win a
special scholarship to the best school in Liverpool, though she did sit the
exam for it; she eventually left school to go to Art College, and she was expected to become a very successful commercial artist. I rather lost sight of
what happened after that, but some years later she was working as an assistant
librarian in a Liverpool Council public library, and suddenly there was a huge row
(of which I was mostly unaware at the time) and she had to get married in a big hurry
to a colleague from work, Malcolm. Which brings us to Malcolm.
Malcolm was a very smart young chap - he
was also very tall, and handsome in a slightly beatnik style (big jumpers, longish
hair, goatee beard). He and Belle had an impoverished start to their
married life - I identify my 11-year-old self in their wedding photo - the next
thing I remember is going round to their rather grotty apartment on my bicycle.
Malc was always sarcastic and condescending towards me, so mostly I went to
visit during my school holidays when he was at work. By this time Belle had one
baby and another on the way, and it didn't take long for me to realise that I
was a bit of a nuisance, so the visits stopped.
During a short space of time, Malc had a
number of jobs - in a later age he would have been seen as possessing ambition
and energy, but at the time he was simply regarded as "shiftless" by
my Nan - my youthful taste for irony was spiked by the thought that he seemed
to do more shifting than most, but no matter.
1. He left the library service, allegedly
over some irregularity in the petty cash
2. He worked for a while as a barman in a
pub in Liverpool city centre, but left following some (alleged) misunderstanding
involving the till receipts.
3. He applied for a job as a news-reader/announcer
with Granada TV (Manchester), but did not get the job - his own version of this
was that it was felt he was too attractive and charismatic, and this would have
impacted upon whether people paid attention to what he was saying. Right.
4. For a little while he did door-to-door
selling for a firm who published popular encyclopedias (a period of history commemorated
by Nan under the title "Gullible's Travels") - I have no idea why or
how this ended.
At this point I lost touch with
Belle and Malc, but they appeared to me just once more, when I was home on
holiday from university.
Malcolm had taken a bold step. If you were
a young man, with decent intelligence but a lack of resolve, and a tad questionable
in the honesty department, what would you have tried for, back in the 1960s?
Correct - the Diplomatic Service of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and
Northern Ireland. Well done - good guess.
Malc sailed the exams, no problems at all,
and got a job. To gloat a little, he hired a very large car, bought himself and
his family new clothes of a quality such as we very rarely saw in those days,
and toured the family members, rubbing our noses in the fact that he was going
to work in a glamorous new post in the British Embassy in Brussels. It was, to
be fair, quite an exit. I never saw Belle or Malc again. After this time I
moved into my own hectic days of professional career and young family, and
thoughts of my globetrotting relatives occupied very little of my waking hours.
Then, one day, my mum phoned to say that she couldn't say much about it, but
Malcolm appeared to be in a lot of trouble, so if any people from the Press
contacted me I was to deny all knowledge.
Pardon? The Press?
After some years in Brussels, Malc had been
transferred to Khartoum. Apparently the Russians (boo!) had either planted a
young female employee in the UK's Khartoum embassy, or else they
"acquired" an existing staff member - whatever, this young lady's
mission was to get involved with some member of the embassy staff, with a view
to blackmail and all that. If they were looking for a vain, senseless prospect
as a dupe, it is just possible that Malc may have been visible as far away as
Moscow, who knows? It doesn't pay to be sanctimonious - these were real people,
and they got themselves into real trouble. It isn't funny - well, maybe a
little...
Eventually the sting was made, Malcolm had
to meet an intermediary, known as André, in the Blue
Nile café in Khartoum [come on - give me a break - if I were
making this up I'd have tried a bit harder than that, for goodness' sake. As a
side issue, we may discuss how this scene would be filmed, and which actors
should play the roles.]
Malc was told that someone would tell his
wife and his employers about his indiscretions if he didn't co-operate by
handing over some information of strategic value. Next, I imagine, there
followed a rather embarrassing conversation, as they came to understand that
Malcolm was really a very junior under-secretary, who did not actually know
anything very interesting at all. He provided them with some details of the
security arrangements in the Brussels office - building access, wiring
diagrams, stuff like that, I am told. To make it respectable, they may have
paid him some money as well - opinions vary.
Poor old Malcolm fell apart. It seems his
wife already knew about his affair, which is a bit humiliating, maybe, and he
went to his boss and admitted the whole episode.
Things moved very quickly. He was arrested,
and the aforementioned Press made the mistake of knocking on my Nan's door.
Barbara was there when the man from the Express
turned up: had Nan known that her son-in-law was a communist spy? Before Nan
slammed the door in his face, according to Barbara, she suggested that he
should go and get himself a decent job, "such as shovelling shit". More
seriously, my dad was about 3 years into a senior engineering job with Reactor
Group at the UK Atomic Energy Authority (or Ukulele,
as they were colloquially known). He was an electrical man, not nuclear, and he
worked on power-station projects, not weapons stuff, but his job involved a lot
of heavy security anyway. As you might expect, the news of his brother-in-law's
adventures went down like the proverbial lead balloon at the Ukulele, and for a
while our mooted film project takes on a comedic twist. The Government had his
house watched. No - honestly, they did. Presumably this was to see if he
received visits from foreign-looking chaps with big furry hats. At first a man
(in a trilby hat, with a newspaper) stationed himself nonchalantly on the other
side of the street, until he was relieved by another such man. In a quiet
suburban street this was ridiculous - the secret service man became a celebrity
locally, the kids threw stones and abuse, and at various times mischievous
neighbours offered him cups of tea, and on one occasion reported to the police
that there was a dodgy-looking character hanging around, obviously up to no
good. The surveillance was now switched to pairs of men sitting all day, very
conspicuously, in a Ford Zephyr, the only parked car in the street.
Again, it wasn't funny at the time, since
my dad could easily have lost his job and his pension. Whatever, the matter was
dropped and the surveillance ended (or did it? - maybe they just got better at
it - I'll take a peek out of the window now...). Probably a combination of the
lack of direct involvement on my dad's part and the obvious ineptitude of the
spying effort convinced them to give up.
Malc went to court, and got 10 years in
Parkhurst, which was probably the minimum sentence. Typically, he missed out on
his last chance for fame, since his trial was pretty cut-and-dried, and there was a
much higher-profile and more interesting espionage case on at the time, which
pushed Malc's charismatic good looks off the newspapers once and for all. His wife
was set up with a good job in London, the kids were placed in a good private
boarding school (at the tax payers' expense) and I never really heard any more.
My mother lost contact with Belle, which is sad, really, but the problems over
my dad's job had damaged things for ever.
Malcolm and Belle have both been dead for
some years now - I met up with two of their kids - a son whom I had met when he
was a toddler, and a daughter who was born after my time. I met them at
Barbara's funeral, in Liverpool, in 2013. My new-found cousins snubbed me
pretty severely - there is clearly a lot of heavy baggage there, so I did not
persist in establishing any kind of entente. To be fair, Malc and Belle and
their children might justifiably have felt that her family did not try very
hard to help or stand by them when they really were having desperately bad
times. It was nothing to do with me, of course, but maybe that's just another
instance of distancing ourselves from a problem. I only have the excuse that I
was somewhere else at the time.
Another skeleton in another cupboard, but
an unusual one, maybe? As I say, if anyone tracks this story down to its facts
then I know nothing about it - my grandmother just told me one of her rambling stories, long ago,
and I may even have remembered it imperfectly.
Saturday, 29 December 2018
Hooptedoodle #319 - Nostalgia Trip
Posts have been a bit sparse of late on
this blog. No matter. One thing I had been meaning to say something about was a
recent visit I made with my wife to Liverpool, my birthplace, at the start of
December. We went only for a few days, and we weren't very lucky with the
weather, but it was good fun, and I did a few things - mostly rather silly,
personal things - that I've been meaning to do for years.
I have only one surviving relative in
Liverpool these days - cousin Mark, with whom we met up for dinner one evening
while we were there - so normally there are no pressing reasons to visit the
place, apart from self-indulgence, and my last visit was in 2012. We stayed at
the Campanile, which is very cheap
and cheerful, at the Queen's Dock. We visited the cathedrals (on the wettest
day I can remember) and trogged around the old city centre, with me trying to
recall what old buildings used to be on particular sites in my day. Yes, I know
- how pointless is that?
I have to say that the city is far cleaner
and more prosperous than I remember it, but it is disturbing how much it has
changed - I have a feeling that some of the change has lost a few things as
well. Babies and bath-water come to mind.
I went to have a look at the house where I
was born - well, all right, I wasn't born there at all, I was born at the
Maternity Hospital (in Oxford Street?) like most other people from the South
end, but I lived there from ages zero to 10.
6, Belvidere Road - that's Liverpool 8,
Toxteth, if you insist, but it is certainly among the posher bits of Toxteth,
and I suppose it's more accurate to refer to it as Princes Park. We got the bus
from the city centre to Princes Avenue, and walked down to Belvidere, which had
changed very little (though the houses look better-maintained, and some
charitable soul has replaced the railings and gates, which obviously were not
required to be thrown at Hitler after all).
We had a splendid walk through Princes Park
to Sefton Park, and then through Sefton Park to my grandmother's old house in
Mossley Hill. When I was a kid we used to do this walk (both ways, in fact)
most fine Sundays, and I was keen to see it again. It always seemed an enormous
distance to walk with small children, but in fact it's not nearly as far as I
remembered - probably only a couple of miles each way. It was a fairly dry day, and everything
seemed very fresh and familiar. I haven't walked through Princes Park since the
1960s, I guess, but it hasn't changed much.
From my grandmother's old house we
continued up Penny Lane to Smithdown, had a coffee and took the bus back into
town. That's another one for the bucket shop list - I'm really pleased I did
it, and I don't need to think about it any more!
We also took advantage of our only other
dry day to travel by ferry across the Mersey to Seacombe. Then we walked along
the riverside promenade past Wallasey as far as New Brighton, on the end of the
Wirral Peninsula, complete with the Perch Rock Fort, which Turner painted in
some of his wilder sessions, but the old Tower Ballroom, where as a youth I once saw
Little Richard, is long gone. New Brighton was definitely looking a bit
gone-to-seed - we took the Mersey Railway back under the river to James Street.
Great walk - I was impressed by the number of fishermen on the promenade - when
I lived in those parts there would have been nothing alive to catch in the
Mersey, that's for sure!
On our last evening we went to the
Philharmonic Hall in Hope Street, to see the Royal Liverpool Philharmonic
Orchestra in action. Marvellous. High spot of the concert for me was
Stravinsky's Firebird, which is a
great favourite of mine. The previous occasion on which I was in the Phil
was probably Speech Day in my final year in the Sixth Form at Quarry Bank
School. Hmmm.
![]() |
| Over the hills and faraway - travelling south on the M6 over Shap Fell. The Lake District is somewhere over to the right |
![]() |
| It still surprises me that Liverpool has become a tourist centre... |
| Let us not speak of the purple dustbins... |
| Princes Park - scenes of childhood... |
| ...and its lake, which once had rowing boats for hire |
| Linnet Lane - apart from the lack of my kid sister's pram and a few modern cars, looks about the same |
| Lark Lane - quite arty these days - leads to Aigburth and my old primary school at St Mick's |
| The quiet end of Queen's Drive, Mossley Hill - this is the great ring road which loops around the city to Seaforth and Bootle in the North. |
| Sefton Park's celebrated Palm House, a fabulous old facility which has been rescued from vandalism and general wear and tear numerous times over the years |
| The Lady Chapel in Liverpool Anglican Cathedral. Speak it in whispers, but I was a member of the choir here when I was about 12 - that was until they found out what was wrong with it. |
![]() |
| The Royal Iris - the latest of a great many Royal Irises - the ferry for Seacombe (Wallasey) - back in the day, the Seacombe ferry had a white funnel, the Birkenhead ferries had brick-red ones. |
![]() |
| Wallasey Town Hall, looming above the River Walk |
Nothing else to do now but wish everyone
all the very best for the New Year. 2018 has definitely been a duff one for
me and my family - we are hoping for rather better in 2019. Once again I regret to
observe that I have been overlooked in the New Year Honours List, but I thought
I'd share with you my great pleasure that John Redwood has been knighted,
presumably for being a pain in the arse for so many years, and for services to
xenophobia. How lovely. Gives me a warm feeling in my stomach - possibly dyspepsia?
***** Late Edit *****
Penny Lane Supplement...
In response to Steve's comment, a couple of old pictures. Penny Lane is an old street in the Allerton area of Liverpool (Liverpool 18, in old money) which runs between Smithdown Place and Greenbank Park. Apart from the fact that it intersects with the road where my Nan used to live(!), it is not all that interesting. On the other hand, "Penny Lane" was the name of the old tram terminus which was at the intersection of Allerton Road, Smithdown Place, Church Road (Wavertree - where the Bluecoat School is), Elm Hall Drive and - well, Penny Lane. The area was known as "Penny Lane", mostly because that was what it said on the front of the trams and buses. As it says in the song, the shelter for the transport terminus is on a roundabout in the middle. That shelter has now been tarted up into a Beatles-themed place. The barber's shop still exists, though back in the 1960s it was owned by Roger Bioletti's granddad (Roger was a year below me at grammar school) - nowadays it, also, lives on the Beatles connection. The main point here is that both the shelter and the barber were, and still are, in Smithdown Place, which is the (sketchy) setting for the song, at the area which has been known for donkeys' years as "Penny Lane", though Penny Lane itself is only one of the streets which runs into that junction.
I may have explained that so brilliantly that even I can't understand it any more. Here are the pictures - all borrowed from elsewhere:
The actual song is a bit of a montage of boyhood memories - some poetic licence in there - the Fire Station is in Mather Avenue - a couple of miles away past Allerton Road, on the way to Garston - on the way, in fact, to McCartney's home at Forthlin Road, which is off Mather Avenue.
All the Beatle-theming and tourist exploitation is probably OK, but ironic to those of us old enough to recall that Liverpool youth in the 1960s was regarded by the local authorities as just as much of a pestilence as you would expect. Visitors today may be directed to the New Cavern in Mathew Street, but they will not see much information about the fact that the council closed the original place down the first real chance they got. Mind you, it was unhygienic and failed every possible H&S test you could think of, but it's nonetheless true that they had regarded it, and places like it, as blots on the official presentation of Liverpool the Commercial City (and former Second City of the Empire, if anyone could remember that). That particular rubber stamp must have been banged down with a lot of satisfaction. How times change. How attitudes are re-engineered to suit.
Slavery and Beat Clubs - choose your viewpoint to fit the times in which you live!
***********************
***** Late Edit *****
Penny Lane Supplement...
In response to Steve's comment, a couple of old pictures. Penny Lane is an old street in the Allerton area of Liverpool (Liverpool 18, in old money) which runs between Smithdown Place and Greenbank Park. Apart from the fact that it intersects with the road where my Nan used to live(!), it is not all that interesting. On the other hand, "Penny Lane" was the name of the old tram terminus which was at the intersection of Allerton Road, Smithdown Place, Church Road (Wavertree - where the Bluecoat School is), Elm Hall Drive and - well, Penny Lane. The area was known as "Penny Lane", mostly because that was what it said on the front of the trams and buses. As it says in the song, the shelter for the transport terminus is on a roundabout in the middle. That shelter has now been tarted up into a Beatles-themed place. The barber's shop still exists, though back in the 1960s it was owned by Roger Bioletti's granddad (Roger was a year below me at grammar school) - nowadays it, also, lives on the Beatles connection. The main point here is that both the shelter and the barber were, and still are, in Smithdown Place, which is the (sketchy) setting for the song, at the area which has been known for donkeys' years as "Penny Lane", though Penny Lane itself is only one of the streets which runs into that junction.
I may have explained that so brilliantly that even I can't understand it any more. Here are the pictures - all borrowed from elsewhere:
![]() |
| Bioletti's barber shop, Smithdown Place, 1960s |
![]() |
| The shelter, in 1956 - looking in exactly the opposite direction to previous photo - this time looking along Allerton Road - the barber's shop must be just off the left edge of the picture |
![]() |
| Somewhat later view of the shelter - circa 1970? - here we are looking towards Church Road, with Allerton Rd off to the right and Smithdown to the left, and Penny Lane itself directly behind us. |
All the Beatle-theming and tourist exploitation is probably OK, but ironic to those of us old enough to recall that Liverpool youth in the 1960s was regarded by the local authorities as just as much of a pestilence as you would expect. Visitors today may be directed to the New Cavern in Mathew Street, but they will not see much information about the fact that the council closed the original place down the first real chance they got. Mind you, it was unhygienic and failed every possible H&S test you could think of, but it's nonetheless true that they had regarded it, and places like it, as blots on the official presentation of Liverpool the Commercial City (and former Second City of the Empire, if anyone could remember that). That particular rubber stamp must have been banged down with a lot of satisfaction. How times change. How attitudes are re-engineered to suit.
Slavery and Beat Clubs - choose your viewpoint to fit the times in which you live!
***********************
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
















