Napoleonic & ECW wargaming, with a load of old Hooptedoodle on this & that
Friday, 3 March 2017
Mixed Fortune on eBay
How about this then? Just happened to see it on eBay, so decided to indulge myself (all right, indulge myself yet again). This is an old cigar box, not awfully glamorous, but the embossed copper lid makes it just the thing to keep my ECW wargame dice and cards in, so I am really rather pleased.
eBay hasn't been working for me recently - I've had a load of books listed for sale, and had hardly any success - eventually the starting prices were so low that I'd rather give them away, so I've put most of them back in the storage boxes until the market picks up again.
One book I did manage to sell was a near-mint copy of the Esposito & Elting Napoleonic Atlas. At the third attempt, I eventually sold it for about £40, which is a snip by any standards, but I regret that it was bought by a London bookshop, who had it on sale in their online shop for over £120 the same day they received it. Oh well.
Anyway - never mind that. Just look at my tacky cigar box - good, eh?
Wednesday, 1 March 2017
ECW: Another Guest Appearance
In the rather awkward intermission following the (temporary) abandonment of my ECW Siege game, I'm delighted to have been rescued - once again - by the bold Steve Cooney, who sent me some more photos - this time of some rather tasty Parliamentarians (if that is not an oxymoron) from his collection.
These chaps are Sir John Gell's Greycoats - 54 Hinton Hunt figures, many of them converted. Thank you Steve - I thought they were well worth sharing here.
Once upon a time, in my software development days, some of our projects scraped along on a wing and a prayer. One of my colleagues was an amateur actor, and we had a standing joke that the show must go on at all costs - if necessary, we reckoned, we should have the juggler standing by to rush on and fill in the gaps - give the punters something to look at. Thus, if the visiting speaker was showing signs of drying up, or the overhead projector packed in, or the promised test network for the prototype demonstration didn't turn up, someone would do the secret mime of a juggler, and the project team would cheer up on the spot.
My thanks to Steve, then, who on this occasion has passed me a set of juggling balls, just in time!
Tuesday, 28 February 2017
Not Quite the Siege of Newcastle 1644 - (4) Stand Down
Best laid plans, and all that.
Unfortunately, a sudden outbreak of Real World means that the (overpublicised?) siege game scheduled for Wednesday has had to be cancelled. Postponed is a nicer word.
It would probably have been more sensible, and certainly less embarrassing, if I had adopted a low-risk approach, kept quiet about the project and simply posted a game report once it had been played, but I never did have much sense. [Oh no - it's been on TMP and everything...]
Anyway - not to worry, I've taken sketches and photos, and I've filed away the documentation so I can set it all up again when opportunity presents itself. I have apologised to the guest generals. Ho hum.
I'll be a little preoccupied for a few days. Look after yourselves until we meet again.
Sunday, 26 February 2017
Not Quite the Siege of Newcastle 1644 - (3) A Moderate Tweak
As discussed in my last post, the real Siege of Newcastle makes an uncomfortable basis for a game, since it was really two separate events with a sort of extended hangover period between. I have now produced a fudged version of the history, which gives a better excuse to stage a proper siege. The scenario is now some weeks earlier than the real event, and the garrison of Newcastle seems to have been augmented by some returning veteran troops who, in complete defiance of accepted history, did not fight to the last man at Marston Moor, but marched off back home at the first opportunity, just squeaking over the bridge into the town before the Scots captured Gateshead and slammed the - erm - gate.
To get round the further issue that the Scots' best strategy appears now to be to wait and starve the town into submission, I've also applied some political and contextual reasons for them to have to get on with taking the place.
I think it will be all right. The game will take place on Wednesday - I shall have one guest general taking the part of the besieged, the other the besiegers, and I shall be the umpire. That may sound nastily as though I will actually play a solo game, with two slaves to help, but I shall take care to ensure it doesn't work like that. The three of us will - collectively - play through our version of the Siege of Newcastle - if it turns out that the town never stood a chance then the process should at least be educational. If it turns out that the rules don't hang together very well then we can agree to patch them on the fly. It's all in an excellent cause. And there will, of course, be some supper.
I've managed to reduce my multiple attempts at siege rules (9 years of false starts, plus numerous manuscript scribbles - some actually jotted down while away on holiday) to a single typed document - well, all right, a mature draft - I still have a little time to check to see if some of the numbers need to be altered to give a balanced game. I have also produced three documents, to set the context for our game. I have one each for the two commanders, telling them what they, personally, need to know, and I have a general preamble, which I shall include here, which sets out the (amended) historical situation in terms which are common knowledge - stuff which can be freely shared.
I'll publish the specific notes for the two commanders, and the OOBs, along with the game report - these chaps are quite crafty enough to check for secrets on my blog...
Here goes - this is the first handout - both commanders get this as a starter.
Preamble
(general knowledge, issued to both commanders)
It is 8am on Monday 3rd October
1644. It is a dreary, cold morning – blustery, with the threat of rain later.
The scene is the area outside the walls on the northern side of Newcastle upon
Tyne, an important coal and commercial centre with a population of about 11,000.
Newcastle has been loyally supportive of King Charles throughout the first two
years of the Civil War. It is a bleak landscape – not enhanced by the presence
of many small, abandoned coal workings and the burned-out ruins of some humble suburbs
that had grown up outside the town’s Newgate and Pilgrim Street Gate, destroyed by the garrison to clear the field of fire from the walls.
The town of Newcastle has had varying
numbers of Scottish Covenanter troops stationed outside it (their HQ is at
Elswick) since they arrived in February, at which time a demand for surrender
of the town was refused. Rather than commit time and effort to a major siege,
the Scots then marched south to Sunderland, leaving a small force to watch Newcastle.
The main objectives of this campaign were always York and the main Royalist
field armies.
Since then the Battle of Marston Moor has
taken place in Yorkshire (2nd July), which was a massive defeat for
the Royalists and in which the Scottish army was heavily involved. Shortly
afterwards the important Royalist city of York surrendered. The King’s
situation in the North is now desperate – with the exception of isolated
garrisons at Pontefract, Carlisle, Durham, Newcastle and a few other places,
there is no prospect of the Royalists re-establishing any significant level of
control, thus their focus is increasingly centred on holding the city of
Chester, which is an important port on the other side of the country and
controls access to North Wales.
The great champion of the King’s cause in
the North, William Cavendish, Marquis of Newcastle, who almost single-handedly
raised and financed the Royalist effort in the North-East, has now gone into
exile in Germany, largely as a consequence of Prince Rupert’s having
successfully shifted the blame for Marston Moor onto his shoulders. He and almost all his
field army are lost to the Royalist effort – a major blow.
The Scottish troops, under Lord Leven, have
now returned to finish the business at Newcastle itself. Apart from its role as
the last major Royalist port in the North-East, Newcastle is an essential
supplier of coal to Parliamentarian London – restoration of the London coal
supply is seen as the main deliverable from capture of the town, and Leven is
now under a lot of political pressure to take the place, and quickly.
The situation in Newcastle is now critical
– though an effort has been made to collect supplies into the town, the arrival
of a fresh Scottish force under the Earl of Callander resulted in the capture
of the town of Gateshead (27th July), on the other end of the only
bridge over the Tyne, and of the fort at
South Shields, at the mouth of the river, so that the town is now cut off from
the outside world for the first time – prior to this, despite a supposed
Parliamentary blockade, some ships had been taking coal to Rotterdam and
Hamburg, and returning with provisions and armaments.
Leven arrived back at Elswick from
Yorkshire on 15th August with his main army – the Scots have now
constructed pontoon bridges across the Tyne both upstream and downstream from
Newcastle, and hold the south bank of the Tyne – the port and castle can now be
fired on from across the river. They have troops and guns all around the town.
There has been an extended exchange of
diplomatic letters between Leven and Sir John Marley, who is both Mayor and
Military Governor of Newcastle. Leven has been urging for speedy surrender, to
avoid unnecessary loss of life (and to protect the coal supply!), and Marley
has deliberately been prevaricating and nitpicking over the protocols under which
terms should be agreed, and about whose fault it will be if bloodshed does
occur. Marley’s obvious aim is to play for as much time as possible, which
seems odd since there is no chance of being rescued by any kind of relieving
force.
Leven is known to be subject to much
criticism in London for what is perceived as a dilatory and otherwise unsatisfactory
showing at Newcastle. There is also a widespread feeling that, after a long and
illustrious military career, he is now too old for the stresses of campaigning
- even his most loyal colleagues fear this may be true. Throughout the
protracted game-playing of Marley’s supposed negotiations for terms of
surrender, Leven has intermittently carried out some limited bombardment of the
town, but it seems to have been more to emphasise his overwhelming advantage
than to destroy the place out of hand.
Leven has a total force of perhaps 20,000
soldiers, stationed on both sides of the Tyne and all around the walls of
Newcastle. The obvious site for batteries to breach the walls is on the ridge
at The Leazes, which faces the medieval town wall between Newgate and Pilgrim Street
Gate. The walls of the town have been repaired, but they are of an archaic
style which predates siege artillery, and there are no earthworks to protect or
support them against roundshot.
Marley’s total force is unknown, but it
cannot be more than a couple of thousand. He has recently sent a couple of
sorties out in the vicinity of the Sandgate (off the table – outside the town
on the riverside, to the east) which went surprisingly well, they caused some
casualties, upset the Scots and took a few prisoners. Scottish morale seems
surprisingly low…
Separate Topic
The Contesse has been sorting out her folders of photos, and she found this rather scary exhibit - I never knew such a picture had been taken, though I shall be on my guard in future. Apparently this was almost exactly three years ago - obviously on a dark and stormy night. In the intervening period, both the sofa and my sweater have gone to the landfill, it seems (you can see why), but the fierce concentration and the Silence of the Lambs magnifying "jeweller's loop" (which I occasionally wear when answering the door, just to frighten the mailman) are still very much in evidence. I had a half-hearted attempt to see if I could work out what I was painting, but didn't get very far.
As you can probably see, one of the difficulties I have in painting is that my nose is too long to allow me to get close enough to the job. As you can also see, one of the advantages of this hobby is that you don't always have to look your best.
Monday, 20 February 2017
Not Quite the Siege of Newcastle 1644 – (2) What Really Happened
…and why it won’t make a very good game
without serious revision of the narrative.
First thing to know about the Siege of
Newcastle is that it doesn’t get a lot of coverage. If you read Peter Young, or
CV Wedgwood, or Gardiner, or just about any of the respectable general
histories, then you will find either no mention at all or else a casual
one-liner about the town having eventually fallen to Parliament. It goes
without saying that it was a matter of the greatest importance to the people
who lived there at the time, but by the time the place surrendered the war had
moved on elsewhere, and the final capture was in any case a foregone
conclusion.
What follows is a summary of my understanding of what
happened – it will certainly reflect my own limited attention span and the fact
that most of my sources are Scottish, so I would not recommend that you base
your homework on it without checking further!
![]() |
| Alexander Leslie, Earl of Leven |
When the Earl of Leven led the Scottish
Covenanter army into Northumberland on the 19th January 1644, he
expected to reach the Tyne by the 27th. He appears to have had no
intention of undertaking any kind of formal siege – the town of Newcastle had
surrendered to him without resistance in 1639, during the brief Bishops’ Wars, and
there seemed every chance that the same thing would happen now. Leven’s army
did not have the best of either luck or weather on their march, and did not
reach Newcastle until 3rd February, by which time the principal
Royalist in the Northern Counties, the Earl of Newcastle (whom I shall henceforth refer to as William Cavendish, to avoid confusion), had managed to reach the
town with some 4000 troops. Leven’s request that the gates be opened to him was
dismissed out of hand. Since his heavy artillery was still en route, having
been sent by ship from Leith to Blyth, his bluff was called, though he probably
had in the region of 17000 soldiers under arms.
![]() |
| William Cavendish, Earl (later Marquis) of Newcastle |
Newcastle stands on the River Tyne, at a
point where the river was a very serious military obstacle – from Newcastle to
the sea there was no crossing point, and there were Royalist forts at the mouth
of the Tyne, at Tynemouth and South Shields, which hindered naval blockade of
the port. On the western side of the town the nearest ford was at Newburn, some
7 miles upstream, with another at Heddon on the Wall, maybe another 2 miles.
Across the river from Newcastle was the town of Gateshead (referred to as
Gatesyde in contemporary Scottish accounts), which commanded the other end of
the only bridge.
![]() |
| View across the Tyne from Gateshead, showing the only bridge |
If Leven were immediately to set up a formal siege of
the town of Newcastle, he would have no control of the south bank of the Tyne,
and the forts would enable an amount of maritime traffic to persist – blockade
or no, boats are known to have continued to take coal from Newcastle to
Hamburg, and maybe Rotterdam, and return with supplies including armaments. The
wider strategic demands of the war required the Scottish army to be available
further afield, and the cost and delay of a siege at this point were not
appealing. Without better control of the river, a besieging army could not even
seal off the town.
Leven decided to move on – he left 6
regiments of foot and some cavalry under James Lumsden to watch the town, and
marched the bulk of his army to the western fords and thence south towards
Sunderland (which was favourably disposed toward Parliament), which became his
base of operations for a while. He captured the fort at South Shields (though
it subsequently changed hands again), and managed to outmanoeuvre Cavendish’s
field army (which apparently had left the “blockaded” town of Newcastle pretty
much at will) fairly consistently through a short campaign which included the
indecisive action at Boldon Hill (see previous game report from last year).
At this point news reached Cavendish of
Parliament’s capture of Selby, in Yorkshire, which increased the threat against
York, so that he chose to march south to support the Royalist effort in
Yorkshire. Leven followed him, and in July both forces were involved in the Battle of
Marston Moor, which pretty much destroyed any effective Royalist control in the
North. In addition, it resulted in Cavendish quitting the country (he moved to
Germany to avoid being humiliated at court, since Prince Rupert managed to
place most of the blame for the defeat with him) and may have marked the
beginning of some disaffection between Cromwell and the Covenanters.
After Marston Moor, York surrendered, and
Leven turned his attention once again to Newcastle, which town’s situation was
now hopeless – there was no possibility of a relief force.
![]() |
| James Livingston, Earl of Callander |
A reinforcement had been sent from Scotland for
Leven’s ragged and weary troops – the Earl of Callander arrived with a further
8000 men, and set about the south bank of the Tyne with some vigour. He
recaptured the forts at the mouth of the Tyne, and took Gateshead on 27th
July – the riverfront, castle and port of Newcastle could now be fired upon
from across the river. With the forts lost, the town was now sealed off, and
hunger was added to the miseries of the townspeople.
![]() |
| Sir John Marley, Mayor and Military Commander of Newcastle during the siege |
Callander placed a pontoon bridge across
the river to the east of the town, near Ouseburn, and Leven’s engineers did the
same upstream, on the west side. By September there were batteries placed all around the town,
there was mining work under way. Then began a long drawn-out series of letters between Leven and Sir John Marley, the mayor of Newcastle. Hostages
were exchanged, formal parties were sent to negotiate. Marley merely wished to
play for time. He later claimed that any demands he could make on the armies of
Parliament, any nuisance he could offer, struck a blow for his king, but there may have been some wisdom in
his strategy. Winter was coming, enthusiasm for a siege which would yield
little must have been waning among the Scots. The defenders managed a couple
of successful sorties, though their resources were very limited, and
successfully destroyed a few mines, and some of Callander’s men were returned
to Scotland, to help with the growing problem of the Marquis of Montrose.
Eventually, Leven’s patience ran out, and on the 19th October a
major bombardment breached the walls in a number of places, and this was followed by a full assault. The town fell quite quickly – the
invaders were surprised how quickly the streets were empty, as the civilian
fighters went home to hide and have their wounds tended to.
![]() |
| The Keep of Newcastle Castle |
Marley and a few of the firebrands locked
themselves in the castle, and left the townspeople to cope with the aftermath.
An attempt to renew the exchange of demands was ignored by Leven, and when the
castle ran out of food Marley, too, surrendered. Legend has it that he required
a bodyguard to protect him from the ire of the citizens.
******
So – as a game?
The early period of confrontation in February is not promising –
the Scots’ inability to seal off the river and the port is crucial, and after
the main army marched south they had enough strength only to mask the town.
By October the forces are overwhelmingly uneven – the Royalists have no food, insufficient troops, old-fashioned fortifications and no chance at all of relief or reinforcement. A siege in such circumstances has, potentially, to quote the Mad Padre, all the fascination of a slow-motion movie of someone being hit by a bus.
By October the forces are overwhelmingly uneven – the Royalists have no food, insufficient troops, old-fashioned fortifications and no chance at all of relief or reinforcement. A siege in such circumstances has, potentially, to quote the Mad Padre, all the fascination of a slow-motion movie of someone being hit by a bus.
I am working on some tweaks to give a more evenly-balanced game! More later...
![]() |
| The Durham Tower today... |
![]() |
| ...and the Herber Tower... |
![]() |
| ...the Walls near Newgate Street... |
![]() |
| ...and at Orchard Street |
Hooptedoodle #252 - Hair, or Why I Never Made It in the Movies
![]() |
| This is not me |
When I was five I had never thought about
my hair. It was curly and a bit lumpy, I guess, but it was just something that
my mother fussed over and brushed into shape. Then I went to school and there
was a boy in my class named Alan Pashley. Alan had flat, shiny, black hair – it
never moved, and you could almost see your reflection in it. This was my
introduction to the world of Brylcreem, the world where some men just had it
and other men just didn’t.
I wanted hair like Alan’s – more than
anything in the world. I was so envious it hurt.
![]() |
| Denis Compton |
At five I was not interested in girls,
obviously, but even at that age I was sufficiently aware of the power of
advertising to know that they would chase you down the street if you put some
branded gloop on your hair. From that time on I always wished I could look like
someone else – almost anyone else, in fact. I once tried a secret experiment
with a blob of my dad’s Brylcreem, but it just produced a greasier version of
the same chaotic, lumpy mess, so I then knew for sure that in my case this was
not just a matter of grooming, it was simply that the raw material was
hopeless.
![]() |
| Robert Beatty |
Things were not helped by the fact that my
dad devoutly believed that boys should part their hair on the left, same as they
buttoned their coats left-over-right, without regard to which direction the
hair grew in. It was a manhood thing.
![]() |
| Johnny Haynes |
Like everyone else, I spent my youth
agonising about my unattractive appearance – things improved very slightly when
I was nineteen and I dared to change my hair, and get it parted on the natural
(girl’s?) side. I’ve never been a big fan of the way I look, but you sort of get
used to it as the years pass, there are other things to fret about, and you
probably reach a stage where girls chasing you down the street would be a
nuisance. And, of course, eventually the damn stuff starts to fall out, so the
problem will be replaced by another…
![]() |
| Good Grief |
Time passes.
My youngest son is now fourteen, and he doesn’t like
his hair. It makes him miserable. Now there’s a surprise. Nothing is new. He
was horrified by a recent photograph of himself, and when we reassured him that
it was actually a good photo, and he looked fine in it, he was furious – our
naïve approval of his hated appearance was the final straw. There is almost no
limit to the things he has to put up with. No-one has ever been this wretched.
Maybe, come to think of it, some things
have changed a little. When I was five, or even nineteen, there were very few
actual film stars around – the rest of us did not expect to look like that – we
all had crooked teeth, dodgy hair, moles, all that. Now the world is run by
viral photos on social media – “products” are available to sort out your hair,
everyone is expected to have good teeth, wear the right labels, cover
themselves in tattoos, circulate hopeful selfies of themselves. If you do not
look like a film star, pal, you are not trying. Maybe failure is more absolute,
less excusable than it was in my day. Do not be ugly, have a pimple on your
nose, etc, because not only will you feel bad about it, but your friends will
crucify you on Instagram.
So we are trying to come up with a supportive, workable
strategy to help our son. The first, and maybe most obvious idea is that he
should get his hair cut rather more frequently, and keep it a little shorter.
It might help – at the very least, you would think, he will have less of it to be offended by. He could try to get it re-styled, or set up some
heavyweight grooming programme involving gloop and conditioner (and cost, and
crap, and frustration, and effort, and wasted time in front of the mirror), but
that is unlikely to work out well in the longer run, and merely adds layers of
paranoia and hopeless struggle to the existing problem. We need to identify a
calm moment, and try to form some sort of plan. Feasible would be good.
I fear that the grooming/gloop approach has
become a colossal industry – the default way of life – many and vast are the
fortunes made by exploiting personal inadequacy. The world is filled with
pictures of kids who miss the point – selfies of 300-pound clones of Paris
Hilton abound, daft photos of boys with a poor copy of someone else’s beard
stuck on the front – just have a look at your Facebook friends’ friends’
friends…
Prayer for a fine Monday morning: Please
send us a little peace. Let us remember that there are people in the world who
have far worse problems than untidy hair – let us try to focus, just a little,
on things that actually matter. Let us see heartless, exploitational
advertising for what it is.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

























