I'm doing some catching-up here, since I have a number of units who are ready for action apart from the flags. Here's another batch; strictly speaking, I've posted the La Corona flags before, but I wasn't happy with the proportions, so I've re-done them. My Cantabria regiment has only one battalion, so I've only done the coronela.
I have more cavalry and light infantry flags to get ready, so I'll get to those when the soldiers are painted. If these are any use to you, please feel free to download and use them as you wish. Usual instructions - click on the image above, right-click on the enlarged version, and download. If you print the entire image 105mm high, the individual flags will be 20mm high, which is fine for 1/72, or you can scale them up or down in proportion - these are not good enough for anything larger than 30mm, by the way! The green surround is not part of each flag - it's just there to enable you to cut a white flag out of white paper!
Use the best quality 80gsm paper you can get hold of. If you can get single-coated paper it's easier to fold and shape. More soon.
Napoleonic & ECW wargaming, with a load of old Hooptedoodle on this & that
Monday, 26 December 2016
Hooptedoodle #245 - St Stephen's Day - Odds & Ends
Boxing Day.
Over the years there have been changing
scripts, but it was always a going-somewhere sort of day. When We Were Very
Young it was the day we visited my other Grannie for another helping of turkey,
not to mention more presents. Later, as the family thinned out and people went
their own ways, it remained a day for going to a show, or watching football, or
just going for a cholesterol-chasing walk in the Pentlands.
![]() |
| Celebrating the Feast of St Stephen in Italy, where they do things properly |
Recovering.
Today is going to be a quiet day, if we
ignore the remains of Storm Barbara howling around the roof windows. We are pretty
much tidied-up after yesterday, but there are no real commitments – I expect
I’ll listen to the football later on, and I want to do some work on drawing up
some more Spanish flags for the newer units in my 1809 army – I’m a bit behind
on that.
So I’m up early, heading for the first
coffee of the day, and all I have to offer in the blog line are a couple of
lightweight stories which are going around my head – entirely, of course, for
my own amusement. The only connecting themes are a loose thread of topicality
and that recurrent Sod’s Law thing about best intentions. All right – I admit
it – the stories have nothing in common…
First tale concerns the singer George
Michael, who, sadly, died at a very early age yesterday. I was never really a
fan, though I did appreciate the gentleman’s talent, and I know my wife will be
upset. This story is really not about George at all, it’s about SDB, whose
story it is anyway. I met SDB and his wife on holiday in Tuscany, a good few
years ago. They were the most excellent fun – he was one of the most engaging,
charismatic people I have met. We kept in touch for a little while afterwards,
but, ultimately, I guess my first wife and I were neither rich enough, outgoing
enough nor metropolitan enough to be especially interesting, so everyone moved
on. Such is life.
SDB was then a director of
Morton’s, the dining club in Berkeley Square. His members included a good many
famous people, as it happens, and one day he was approached by one of them –
George Michael, no less – to arrange a very private business luncheon meeting
at the club, involving some important guests. Michael was in the process of
falling out with Sony Records at the time – I don’t really know the details,
but this meeting was such that there would be trouble and controversy if it
became public knowledge.
Being a man of tact and discretion, an
experienced helper of the rich and mysterious, SDB had a brainwave and – taking
advantage of the fine weather – he decided against simply allocating a private
room, and placed the luncheon party on a private balcony in the sunshine, above the gardens – probably above the nightingales, if there had been any.
Perfect, except that, just as the soup arrived, an open-top tour bus full of
Japanese tourists passed by, and an amplified voice announced, “Oh look,
everyone – there’s George Michael!”, which was followed by a rush to the
appropriate side of the bus and a mighty clicking of cameras.
So much for secrecy – SDB said that there
was trouble, sure enough, and plenty of it came his way. Oh well.
![]() |
| Jenners |
Story 2 is much less elevated – my old
musician mate, Fergie (whom I also haven’t seen for years – maybe that’s the
real thread), used to keep us entertained on band trips with tales of the shopping
exploits of his wife. She was a devoted warrior of the Edinburgh Boxing Day
Sales, and, though Fergie enjoyed the peace and quiet while she was out
warrioring, he was less enthusiastic about the trophy ritual when she came
back, at which point her purchases would be paraded for his delectation – an
edgy procedure, since he was not encouraged to express any opinion beyond
breathless admiration.
On one occasion he was unwise enough to
comment on a very distinctive, red, green and white sweater in a Jenner’s bag
(now there’s an Edinburgh tradition). Yes, he was told, it was reduced from
£145 to only £85, so it was a particularly splendid buy.
Fergie, never knowing when to quit, stuck
to his guns.
“Just a minute,” he said, “I’ve seen that
sweater before – don’t you have one like that already?”
I can sense the reader flinching in
anticipation. This provoked a disagreement which eventually drove him upstairs
to the wardrobe for more evidence. He returned, in triumph, with another
Jenner’s bag, containing an identical red, green and white sweater. The receipt
was still in the bag – it had been bought in the previous year’s Boxing Day Sales, and had never been worn. Also, to
cap everything, last year’s specimen had been reduced from £145 to £75.
The subsequent discussion was not
especially constructive, we were led to believe, but Mrs Fergie, as ever,
got in the last word as she swept out of the room.
“I may be a bit dippy at times,” she said,
“but at least you can’t deny that I have consistent taste.”
Friday, 23 December 2016
Hooptedoodle #244 - Seasonal Exercise in Self-Indulgence
A week or so ago I was stopped in my tracks by a painting in one of the local high street galleries - I liked it so much that I bought it as a Christmas gift for my wife.
As I mention here frequently (ad nauseam?), the Contesse and I are both very keen on our local wildlife - she in particular is a very skilled photographer - and I knew she would love this picture. It is an original, acrylic on natural linen, by the Scottish artist, Helen Welsh. Helen is based in Perthshire, a little north of here; she worked for many years, very successfully, as an illustrator for the Dundee-based publisher, DC Thomson (no, she didn't draw the pictures in the Beano), and has now retired to concentrate on her original passion, painting Scottish wildlife.
Anyway, by any standards a piece of original art is a bit of an extravagance here at Chateau Foy, but we are very pleased with it, and I thought some of you skilled wielders of acrylics out there might appreciate it also.
Here, then, is A Hare in Winter, by Helen Welsh. Let it serve as a simple, locally-themed greeting card to all readers of the old Aspic blog - I wish everyone a happy, peaceful, comfortable Christmas, and may next year be a little less crazy than 2016 turned out. All the best!
As I mention here frequently (ad nauseam?), the Contesse and I are both very keen on our local wildlife - she in particular is a very skilled photographer - and I knew she would love this picture. It is an original, acrylic on natural linen, by the Scottish artist, Helen Welsh. Helen is based in Perthshire, a little north of here; she worked for many years, very successfully, as an illustrator for the Dundee-based publisher, DC Thomson (no, she didn't draw the pictures in the Beano), and has now retired to concentrate on her original passion, painting Scottish wildlife.
Anyway, by any standards a piece of original art is a bit of an extravagance here at Chateau Foy, but we are very pleased with it, and I thought some of you skilled wielders of acrylics out there might appreciate it also.
Here, then, is A Hare in Winter, by Helen Welsh. Let it serve as a simple, locally-themed greeting card to all readers of the old Aspic blog - I wish everyone a happy, peaceful, comfortable Christmas, and may next year be a little less crazy than 2016 turned out. All the best!
Wednesday, 21 December 2016
Hooptedoodle #243 – Dear Mummy and Daddy
Clearing out my mother’s house has now
reached a greater level of detail – I am now spending more time with my head in
boxes of stuff, sorting out what should be kept. I take care to have my name
and address written on the soles of my shoes, in case I need to be rescued.
Paper.
My mum seems to have every postcard that
she was ever sent, and a great heap of birthday cards and letters, accumulated
in large manila envelopes, with not the slightest trace of classification – a
trip into one of these envelopes is just a mind-numbing exercise in randomness.
She certainly has no idea what’s in there, and I’m not sure if she remembers
many of the people who sent them, so it’s a little complicated – though
interesting in its way.
Recently I found some letters from me,
written when I was very young. Mostly letters about forgotten trips, written by
a child I cannot really remember having been. About the earliest of these dates
from a week I spent in hospital – I had some stomach problems – certain foods
made me sick, and the doctors decided that my appendix had to come out. To this
day, I’m not convinced there was anything at all wrong with my appendix, but at
that time the medical profession was just itching to separate kids from their
tonsils, adenoids and appendices (?) at the slightest excuse.
![]() |
| Myrtle Street hospital, a few years after I was there |
So my stay in the Liverpool Children’s
Hospital, Myrtle Street, was one of the very earliest times I was separated
from my mother. I have remembered some things about this episode, and more came
flooding back when I saw the letter.
(1) A stout lad named Gordon, who was in
the next bed – he had some horrifying sort of drain in his knee, but his main
claim to fame was that he used to lend me some pretty raunchy American comics
he had inherited from his big brother
(2) Ribena – aargh – they forced gallons of
blackcurrant flavour squash down us – served up in aluminium mugs. Woe betide
anyone who didn’t finish it. I still can’t stand the stuff.
(3) The smell of hot tar. It was fine, warm
weather, and throughout my stay the City Council was pulling up the old
tramlines outside in Catherine Street and Myrtle Street, and laying tarmac – a
very big project. A week with an asphalt cooker outside your window is not
recommended.
(4) Most exciting - we had a visit from Roy
Rogers. Now then – my lifelong devotion to celebrities got off to a flying
start. This is the thing I wanted to recall here.
Roy Rogers (1911-98), in case you are not old enough
to have heard of him, was a very big deal at the time – children all over the
world just loved him – it said so on his publicity posters. Born Len Slye in
Cincinnati, he was a Western cowboy movie star, recording artist (he was, to be
fair, not a bad singer if you like that sort of thing) and a complete
merchandising operation – very impressive – he even had a string of restaurants
named after him. Me and my mates were not too convinced about Roy. When we went
to the Saturday morning cinema matinee (at the Gaumont in Allerton Road, which was a bit less rough than our local
flea-pits), the cowboy films we preferred starred Lash LaRue (which sounds a
bit dodgy now), Monte Hale, Rocky Lane, Tim Holt – we were definitely less keen
on the more showbiz style productions starring Roy Rogers or Hopalong Flaming
Cassidy – though Rogers’ movies were normally in colour, which was unusually
luxurious for that market.
Roy was doing a European theatre tour at
the time, and he visited Liverpool. It seems remarkable now, but this caused
about as much excitement as if the Pope had come. Crowds lined the streets to
greet him, and he and his trusty horse, Trigger, were accommodated at the Adelphi, which was probably Liverpool’s
only worthwhile hotel at the time. It has become a matter of Merseyside
folklore that Trigger had his own room, which I’ve always dismissed as celeb
goss (darlings) – I assumed that Trigger had stayed in the Adelphi’s stables.
However, it seems that he was installed in a room – at least the official
records claim that he was. Trigger duly appeared on a balcony, to acknowledge
the cheering fans below. You get the idea – these were rather dismal days, I
guess, and Liverpool was pretty close to the Third World.
![]() |
| Roy and Trigger enter the Adelphi |
![]() |
| Trigger signs into the hotel (surely not?), and visits his master, who was laid low with influenza, apparently - maybe this disrupted his schedule. |
You may imagine the breathless excitement
when Roy and Trigger were to visit the Children’s Hospital during my stay. The
place was cleaned and then cleaned again – no comics or spare plates or anything
were to be in sight – the nursing staff had their best No.1 kit on, starched and flawless, and
everyone was very tense. Including me, of course – I was prepared to swallow my
normal disbelief in Roy’s marketed persona, just to bask for a moment in the glamorous world of Hollywood. The word was that the Liverpool
Echo would send a cameraman, and photos would be taken with the kids. How
cool is that?
Well, it really turned out to be an early
lesson in How Things Rarely Turn Out As
You Hoped. The official party was 3 hours late. Trigger was not allowed in the hospital
(probably just as well), and Rogers made a very fast pass through the
wards. I had a brief, distant glimpse of a rather uninteresting-looking, hatless,
middle-aged man in a pale grey business suit, who waved from the door of the
ward (a ward which was about the size of a football field). So much for celebs.
My contempt for the Roy Rogers brand was confirmed and reinforced – he was
never forgiven.
This clip is maybe a little more like the sort of extravaganza I expected to see during the visit. Not a bad singer, but as a tough-guy cowboy hero he was a bit of a girl's blouse, wasn't he?
Wednesday, 14 December 2016
French Siege Train: More Gunners
Thanks for positive reaction to the painted SHQ siege artillerymen from last week. I quite enjoyed the "factory" process of painting up the first lot of gunners for the Siege Train, so was happy to bash on ahead this week and get the rest of them done. It went well enough (though my current favourite brush seems to be moulting), and I got them finished quite quickly.
I have to confess to a faint unease about this little project - I'm happy to have made such good progress (eventually), but there is something about it which maybe says something about me which I don't really care for. Online, one sees all sorts of projects which are beautiful, or which make use of rare and glorious figures, or which represent the height of the figure-painter's art for us to relish. This is none of these things - it is just BIG. Having decided to do it, I have gone about it (relentlessly?) and got it finished - it's kind of industrial. Never mind - I guess it's a personal style or something.
That's the guns ready for the French siege train, then - I may paint a couple of water buckets or ammo chests to make the bases more interesting, and I have some officers and some digging soldiers to paint - all looking quite promising. Another major gap in the Napoleonic siege effort is I still have to obtain some of the special MDF buttresses to enable guns to stand on my Vauban walls - it's in hand - the drawings exist, I just have to meet Michael from Supreme Littleness for a coffee next week and we are back on track.
Good. I'll tidy the brushes away until after Christmas.
Separate Topic - more pottery buildings.
I have obtained a couple more buildings for my ECW town...
| Two batteries of howitzers and two of Gribeauval mortars, to add to the siege cannons |
| All right then - let's have a look at what's in this box now... |
| ...all right, that's the whole lot |
Good. I'll tidy the brushes away until after Christmas.
Separate Topic - more pottery buildings.
I have obtained a couple more buildings for my ECW town...
| On the right, The Priory, Lavenham, on the left a rather odd church... |
| ...it's flat-backed! What in model railway circles I believe we used to call low relief - this is a church to stick in the distance, against the edge of the table. |
Thursday, 8 December 2016
French Siege Train: A Little Progress
The guns were painted up months ago, but recent diversions in the Real Life Dept have meant that the siege train has been stuck in a siding for a while.
The first batch of gunners are now painted and ready - I'm pleased with them. As ever, they are finished in my simple old toy soldier style, and the unpretentious little SHQ/Kennington crewmen are absolutely fine for purpose. These are the 3 batteries of 24pdr siege guns (old La Vallière pattern models, as is historically accurate for the French in Spain, though the purist might object to the rather later style of jacket...). The crews for the mortars and howitzers are undercoated and on the bottletops, so they should follow shortly.
The siege train also merits some senior officers to go with it, so I'll see what I can come up with.
| You wish to lose a wall? a bastion, perhaps? These are the boys for you |
The first batch of gunners are now painted and ready - I'm pleased with them. As ever, they are finished in my simple old toy soldier style, and the unpretentious little SHQ/Kennington crewmen are absolutely fine for purpose. These are the 3 batteries of 24pdr siege guns (old La Vallière pattern models, as is historically accurate for the French in Spain, though the purist might object to the rather later style of jacket...). The crews for the mortars and howitzers are undercoated and on the bottletops, so they should follow shortly.
The siege train also merits some senior officers to go with it, so I'll see what I can come up with.
| Jean-Marie ponders - dolphins? why dolphins? |
Sunday, 4 December 2016
Sieges: A Small Matter of Supplies (and Mining, Just a Bit)
I’m pleased to say that my elderly mother
is now safely moved to a care home, which is the best outcome all round – it
has been a very difficult and distressing time. Also, we have now sold her house,
which was quicker and far easier than it might have been, so, with a bit of
luck, my life should be returning to something a bit nearer a state of
normality in the next few weeks.
Without
wishing to jump the gun, I thought it would be good to plan a celebratory
wargame – a proper, social wargame – for the first time in ages. And it also
seemed like an opportunity to try out the siege game again, after my brief but
unsustained spell of progress in April. When I come to think about it, though,
there is a bit of a problem. It’s all very well running a solo siege,
correcting (frequently inventing) rules as I go along, and glossing over the
incomplete bits (such as supply – and then there’s mining…), but playing this
as an actual game with real people requires a rather more polished show. Thus I
am proposing to get the rules typed up in a sensible form (sort of), and fill
in the more obvious holes in the game. If some motivational soul ever points
out to me that a problem is really an opportunity, my instinct is normally to
give them the opportunity of removing my cup of coffee from their shirt front,
but it does seem a good idea to embrace this excuse for getting the rules
written up. Yes – all right – before I
forget them again – quite so. Thank you.
Let’s deal with mining very quickly, and
I’ll return to it in some future post. In about 2010, Clive S came up here to
help out with some siege testing, and it was pretty good fun, but one thing
that was clearly wrong was the effectiveness of mining. Mining was so devastatingly
successful in the test game that it made us wonder why anybody ever bothered
with all that tedious bombardment stuff. As I frequently do, I shelved the
problem, pending some great leap of inspiration or some further research. My
shelves are overloaded with things like that.
Trouble was that my mining rules were so
brilliantly clever that I had completely missed the point, and failed to check
the dimensions of the problem. Clive and I had our mining parties tunnelling at
speeds which would have left the machines which dug the Channel Tunnel miles
behind. I will not give details of just how fast our miners could dig – it’s
too embarrassing – but if such speeds had been possible then it is clear that
mining would definitely have been the standard approach – in fact the whole
history of fortification (and everything
else) would have been vastly different. Just put it down as a misunderstanding.
I did a fair amount of reading of late –
the most useful source was a nice little booklet published by the Shire people,
Siege Mines and Underground Warfare,
by Kenneth Wiggins. He actually discusses digging and tunnelling techniques,
but the main thing I took from all this scholarship is that miners who had no
bad luck and knew what they were doing would do well to average 3 paces a day
for the progress of a tunnel.
Ah – right. 3 paces a day is about 20 paces
a week, which is one tenth of the way across one of my terrain hexes. This is a
very small nibble indeed in one of our battlefields, and requires a whole new
look at the matter. Hmmm. This also explains why mining was something of a secondary
activity – though useful on its day, of course. I’ll think about this.
Just before I leave the subject of mining –
does anyone know where they keep those Channel Tunnel digging machines when
they are not using them? Just wondered. It doesn’t seem like the sort of thing you
would throw on the back of a low-loader and off to the next job – interesting…
So – supplies.
![]() |
| SUPPLIES! |
I am looking for some dead-easy approach to
supplies which does not lead to either insanity or a crippling bookkeeping
industry, yet prevents the matter being forgotten completely. My rule of thumb
(it may be one of Foy’s Laws, but I can’t remember which one) is that the
cleverer and more realistic you make your add-on rules (command, morale,
supply, whatever), the more fiddly they become and the more likely they are to
be dropped during an otherwise exciting game. In other words, if you really
wish to exclude all consideration of command and activation from your wargame
(for example), spend a few weeks developing the cleverest rule system the world
has ever seen to cover this, and the players will just abandon it on the day. [This
may have some parallels in the world of Brexit legislation, but let us not go
there.]
I started off with provender – I’ll leave
ammunition for the moment. Starting place, obviously, is Bruce Quarrie.
Interesting, but far too much information, man. Can’t see the wood for the
flipping trees. From the classic Siege of
Dendermonde I picked up the useful idea of 2 lbs of bread plus 1 lb of meat
per man per day. Ron Miles had a lot of detail in there about how many portions
of meat you get from slaughtering a cow (1000) or a sheep (80) or even a cat
(1.5), so I decided the simplest way to do this is add the whole lot together
as food rations – not to worry what the recipe of the day was. The important
bit is that a soldier needs 3 lbs of food a day. A magazine will contain a
weight of food, and I’ll formulate some rules on how much this needs to be. As
a quick aside, this is an aspect of warfare I have always studiously avoided –
so I was interested to see what amounts are involved here.
My unit of strength for my ECW forces is
the base – 6 figs per base for foot (200 men), 3 per base for horse (100). It
occurred to me that it might be a nice additional convenience to add fodder
into the food stores as well, and assume that 100 horsemen consume the same
amount as 200 foot – let us stop short of whether the men can eat hay or the
horses like their beef well cooked – I’m looking for the simplest-ever supply
system.
![]() |
| This is a detailed depiction of 4 lbs of food - that's all you need to know |
Thus a base of foot will require 200 x 7 x
3 lbs per week, which is, near enough, 2 tonnes, if you add in the drink. That
is a lot – thus a regiment of 3 bases of foot will eat their way through 6
tonnes a week, and (by dint of my bovine assumption of equivalence) a unit of 4
bases of horse will require 8 tonnes. On the basis of no science at all, I’ll
assume that an artillery unit needs 4 tonnes a week – they have few personnel
but a great many draught animals.
The poor old citizenry do not get to eat as
heartily as the soldiers. I’ll assume that 1 tonne will feed 500 civilians for
a week. OK – that gives me a basis to get started. I’ll add a rule about
rations – military and civilian personnel may get full, ¾, ½, ¼ or no rations –
which will affect the health and vigour and general happiness of all parties.
Oh yes – about the civilians…
In the absence of factual historical data,
the population of a township or conurbation can be generated by the formula nD6
x k, where n has the following values:
Major
City – 15
Provincial
City – 10
Market
Town – 6
Village
or fortress – 3
My first
assumption is that k should be 250 (I
may change my mind later) – thus a market town turning up 6 4 4 3 3 1 with its
6 dice has a population of 21 x 250 = 5250.
Standard
split is 50% females; for both sexes, one quarter are children and infants, one
quarter old or infirm, thus one half able-bodied. Overall split then is
Females
– children 12.5%, able bodied 25%, old/infirm 12.5% and the same for Males, so
our market town of 5250 might yield 25% able-bodied men = 1315 approx.
Now I
need to check how much you can get in a wagon, how much on a mule. I bet Bruce
Quarrie has something on this…
Next I
need to develop this a bit, and work out some dice algorithms for the
relationship between diet and vigour, vigour and susceptibility to outbreaks of
fever; I also need to work out some rules for how the effective strength of a
garrison is affected by the need to police the population, and how the attitude
and loyalty of the population is affected by things like food supply, sustained
bombardment. Lots to think about – that’s OK, I have some more free time and a
bit more spare brainpower than I had a week or two ago, so I’ll enjoy the
challenge!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)













