Napoleonic & ECW wargaming, with a load of old Hooptedoodle on this & that


Tuesday, 10 September 2013

Summer Prize Competition 2013 – Results



Time up – please stop writing and put your pens down.

Well now – fascinating. Thanks again, ever so much, to everyone who entered into the spirit of the thing and submitted a name for my new ECW siege mortar – I had a lot of fun reading through them, though it certainly hasn’t been easy coming up with a winner.

There were so many really good names suggested – including a wealth of variations on the theme of large or otherwise formidable ladies, with excellent descriptions and classical references.

Pjotr suggested Big Mathilde (a B-List entry – he didn’t want the prize), and I voted this the best of the B-Listers, largely because of his story and supporting photo of a statue in Ostend which is officially called The Sea, but is universally known as Dikke Mathilde. Here she is…

The Sea...?
Special mention – among so many other good suggestions - goes to Bloggerator for Sharp Rejoinder (a pleasing tribute to Iain Banks, apart from being a good name in its own right), to Steve for Apollyon (the angel of destruction from The Pilgrim’s Progress, which has a good, near-contemporary relevance apart from the classical kudos) and – especially – to David Crook’s splendid Fuggle’s Thunder, which is based on the engrossing but unlikely tale of the famed dyspepsia of a blacksmith named Harbottle Fuggle. I also liked Evan’s God’s Hammer, and Peter’s graceful Swan of Lonsdale, which ties in nicely with my north-western campaign plans, but is maybe an odd name for a gun. I was intrigued by Vance’s Are You Sure?, and there were a couple of other ideas which may have owed something to chemical stimulants, but all very entertaining.

After much pondering, I decided I like Ray’s The Clapperdudgeon best, mainly because it is such a fantastic word. A clapperdudgeon, it seems, was a king of the beggars – there is also a theory that the word relates to a specialist beggar who treated his skin with arsenic, to produce wounds akin to leprosy and thus increase his market value. Too gory for me – the King of Beggars will do nicely and – as Ray suggests – old Charles I might be just the boy!

The Clapperdudgeon!
Pjotr and I had a brief email exchange on the topic of why the default personality should be female for an object whose physical form would appear, intuitively, to be sort of male (you would think). Pjotr’s view, with which I think I agree, is that there might be a certain reluctance for rough servicemen to say much about working with, handling or even admiring Big Archie (for example) – traditional military homophobia would make mastery of large females much less embarrassing. Let’s move on, quickly.

Congratulations and best wishes to Uncle Ray. Thanks again, everyone.

Monday, 9 September 2013

Hooptedoodle #96 - Fashion Icon

Since Martin and Prof De Vries both scoffed at the idea of the Max Foy limited edition tee shirt, here is some firm evidence. Eat your heart out.


Sunday, 8 September 2013

Danube Trip – Bribes & Gifts Dept

In grateful response to excellent suggestions made previously on this blog, I have been arranging for a small stock of diplomatic goodies for our forthcoming trip, to go some way towards rewarding our volunteer battlefield guides for their efforts. For a while I considered painting up a suitable figurine myself, but I don’t really have time (though I would like to have done it), and there is a slight risk that the recipient might not have known what it was if I had.


Thus I have obtained a ready-painted collector figure from FirstLegion, and here he is. This, gentlemen, in 54mm, is a sapper of the Bavarian I.R. Nr. 5, Graf Preysing, as he would have appeared at Eggmühl. He is pictured next to a bottle of genuine East Lothian Falling-Down Water – we have a couple of these to take. They are usually well received.

I did also consider the special, limited-edition Max Foy teeshirt (available in L, XL and XXL), but decided against it. If you are interested in FirstLegion, click here. If you are interested in Glenkinchie, click here.

This just proves that I do occasionally listen to other people’s ideas – thanks very much, guys!

Friday, 6 September 2013

The Engineer and the Coffee Table



I am still exploring the possibilities for providing my British Peninsular army with some engineers and sappers for their siege activities, as discussed in a recent post. I have had some very interesting and useful suggestions, for which thanks to anyone I haven’t thanked already. I’ve looked at some plastic ACW engineers, which were interesting but not quite suitable (primarily because of that physique thing – 1/72 plastic models are mostly wonderfully sculpted, but they also seem to represent a race of men with skinnier build and smaller heads than 1/72 metals), and the latest suggestion – from Rod – is the Art Miniaturen set JS72/0468, Napoleonic Austrian engineers, for which I have reproduced Herr Schmaeling's  catalogue picture at the top of this post. I’ve ordered some of these. I reckon a man in a shirt is a man in a shirt, regardless of nationality, though I may feel the need to carve off the odd moustache.

I think the aforementioned Finescale Factory French pontonniers which I have in the Spares Box may also switch sides and join the Brits – still thinking about this – and I have been offered some weaponless British infantry who should lend themselves to odd-jobbing and landscaping. One thing I haven’t got a source for is someone like this...


This is the only depiction I’ve ever seen of a British engineer from this period in serious working kit. The drawing is by Richard Scollins, and comes from a book I have which has an unjustly chequered past.

The book is shiny, big format. The edition I have comes from Book Club Associates, and the whole production is very obviously that most uncomfortable of things, a Coffee Table Book [gasp]. You know the sort of thing – lots of nice pictures and not much detail. A book about sieges for people who really couldn’t care less. You just know that the well known print of Major Ridge of the 5th climbing the breach at Badajoz will be there and – sure enough – there it is. My lack of enthusiasm is evidenced by the fact that I unsuccessfully tried to unload it on eBay – twice, I think. No takers.



Well, in fact the book is not bad at all, once I got around to having a proper look at it. If anyone else is selling it on eBay, it's worth a modest bid. It contains some good stuff on artillery and engineering and all the unglamorous bits of sieges, and there are a lot of illustrations I’ve never seen anywhere else. So – credit where it’s due – I regret having previously rejected this volume – it’s fine. It even has some good pictures of British 10-inch howitzers, and you can’t get more specialist than that.

Monday, 2 September 2013

Hooptedoodle #95 - The Wrong Tariff




I spent some time this weekend sorting out my mother’s account with BT – that’s British Telecom, who provide her with (predictably) broadband and telephone services. She is a customer of BT largely because I am one, and I am one because part of the bewildering network of BT companies – Openreach – provides and maintains the cabling and the communications infrastructure in this corner of the world; I chose to avoid getting stuck in the middle of the finger-pointing exercise which invariably follows any problem with a slow, precarious country broadband service if you have separate suppliers who can pass the blame on to each other.

Apart from my lack of enthusiasm for their customer helplines, I find BT OK. It takes a bit of constant monitoring to make sure we get value for money, but they probably compare favourably at present with our alternative suppliers.

Someone else's mum
My mum’s problem was that she had got stuck in The Wrong Tariff. I myself am in what I consider to be The Correct Tariff with BT, but only because I have the time, the knowledge and the resources to put regular effort into monitoring my bills online, and keep tabs on the constantly changing product names and complicated pricing arrangements which telecoms firms – and much of the rest of the commercial world – use to con us out of our money, not to mention our time. My mum would not know where to start. I know how to do it, but increasingly I begrudge the effort required, and – increasingly – I am not sure why we have to keep up this struggle.

Some specifics – I just know you want some details of my mother’s account.

When my mum got broadband set up – primarily so that she could do her shopping online – we agreed to what was called BT Total Broadband 2, which allowed her rather more data-shifting capacity than she was ever likely to require, and also got her a complementary licence for anti-virus and firewalling from McAfee. For actual land-line phone calls, she was offered a deal called Unlimited Weekends and Evenings, which requires a standing charge of £2 a month, and allows you – that’s right – free calls to UK land-line numbers in defined off-peak hours plus some other discounts on calls to mobiles in those periods.

And, since about March 2008, that contract has been running happily. Every month, BT send a direct debit request to her bank, and convenience reigns withal. This month she got a letter from BT telling her that, since her current monthly debit is not meeting costs, she has run up a bit of a debt, and thus they will be increasing her payments to an amount which surprised me. My mum is 88 and pretty deaf, and uses the Internet about twice a month to get her groceries ordered. So I set up online billing for her with BT, and we had a good look at what’s what.

Wrong Tariff.

Because of her circumstances, she makes all her phone calls during the day. She is (sadly) running out of people she might wish to phone in the evenings, and the concept of a weekend is meaningless when you are 88. My mother is paying full price for all her phone calls. Also, her broadband usage is trivial, and the free McAfee package is so awful that we replaced it ages ago with a free Microsoft product which works better and is less of a nuisance.

Wrong Tariff – and, because we should have spotted it and done something about it before now, I have the additional burden that it is our – well, my – fault. If at any time I had called up BT and complained about value for money, they would have said – quite correctly – that we were getting what we asked for and signed up for.

Quite so
By reducing the service level to basic, no-frills broadband, and changing the phone contract details to Unlimited Anytime (£7 a month), as from 9th September, her monthly costs will now drop from £59 to £35, which is important if you are a pensioner. The infuriating things about this are:

(1) Her use of BT services will be exactly the same, whatever the contract is called.

(2) BT claim that they keep a paternal eye on your account, to make sure that you are in the best-value, most suitable contract and that your payments are adequate. Bollocks.

(3) BT’s focus – in common with everyone else’s nowadays – is the new customer. By definition, anyone who is an old customer is a mug and should be stiffed mercilessly until they notice and complain about it. I call this “The Negative Loyalty Bonus”. It is everywhere – don’t get me started. In the last few years, we have had major fights about pricing with our insurance company, our supplier of domestic LPG, our mobile phone companies, our BANKS (aargh!), etc etc. In most cases, we ended up changing suppliers, and saved a lot of money, but many people don’t, and many people just keep on handing over cash they can’t afford.

I’ll spare you the rant about Aviva, BP, Royal Bank of Scotland and all the others – maybe for another day. This is now business as usual. I hate it. Let me end with two short stories about lightbulb moments in my economic education – I apologise if I come across as unreasonably trusting or naïve in these, but I tell it as it is.

My background includes a lot of study, including some heavy, classical economics, but I come from a druidic, actuarial world in which the prices of things are worked out scientifically with great precision, and the dirty spirit of competition sneaks into pricing only at the last minute, to ensure that one might actually sell something occasionally. The concept of someone getting ripped off is not incomprehensible, but certainly alien to my upbringing.


Story 1 – the Man from Swissair

In the days when I was in salaried employment, and before I made the strategic error of becoming unfashionably old, I used to get sent on what were laughingly described as management training courses. I can only assume they offered my employer a source of tax-deductible expense. The main, maybe the only, attraction of these was that I got to meet some interesting people.

On one course, there was a fellow from Swissair, and he described for my benefit that strange phenomenon which occurs on aeroplanes, where no two people may have paid the same price for their tickets, though they will consume the same food and fuel and arrive in the same place at the same time. Neanderthal that I was, I had never really thought about this before. The most interesting bit came at the end. There is a point, he said, where the tickets sold cover the cost of the flight, and anything at all you can make on any further empty seats is a bonus.

Thus the fact that business class passengers from Geneva to NYC in those days were paying £1400 a pop was irrelevant. Once the flight was paid for, any remaining seats could be sold for almost nothing. If the extra passenger would require say £50 worth of extra fuel and food, then he might fly for £50.50 and you would have made a profit of 50 pence.

Yes, I know that everyone understands this, but for me it was a lightbulb.


Story 2 – Price Guarantees

A kid who was a friend of one of my older sons got a job for six months before he went to college. He worked as assistant manager in a computer game store, on a shopping mall on the outskirts of Edinburgh. He was seventeen and a half, and he knew nothing about anything, but he explained to me how price guarantees work.

In his store there were notices up on the walls, which said something like

“If you can purchase any product from a physical shop within 12 miles of here for less than we sold it to you, we will gladly refund the difference”

And then, of course, they deliberately cranked up their prices by about 5%, right across the board, so they knew they were more expensive than the competition.

If anyone spotted a cheaper product elsewhere, remembered the guarantee, still had the receipt and could be bothered paying to travel all the way out to the outskirts of the city, the shop would happily, smilingly make the promised refund. Have a nice day. However, in reality, hardly anyone ever came back. The deliberately inflated prices made them a lot of extra profit – in some cases doubled the mark-up on specific products.

This applies in big, respectable department stores as much as nerd shops. If your local John Lewis publicizes such a price guarantee, it’s a pretty safe bet (said my young tutor) that they know their prices are high to start with, and they are chancing it.

Lightbulb.

Saturday, 31 August 2013

Summer Prize Competition 2013



I’ve been meaning to do something about this for a while, but kept getting distracted. Now the fact that the Summer is starting to look a bit tired here has prompted me to get on with it.

I’ve given up on my previous “place the photo” system – it was fun, but mostly just for me.

Here’s a simpler idea. The overgrown ECW mortar from my previous post looks as if it could do with a name. I know they liked to name their artillery pieces in those days – give them personalities. So let’s go with that.

Here’s what to do – please send me a comment, or email to the address in my Blogger profile, setting out what you think the gunners might have called their mortar, why you think it’s a good name (any personal stories explaining associations are likely to give extra credits), how you think history should record the reason it was given this name and anything else you think might be relevant – or of interest, even if not relevant. Gratuitous profanity (beyond a realistic measure of historically-authentic colour) will lose you marks.

I thank you.

I’ll score any responses entirely subjectively and unfairly, bringing to bear the full weight of my customary, unreasoning prejudice. The sender of the entry which pleases me most will win a prize, plus – of course – a little measure of immortality in the lasting name of the mortar.

Oh yes – the prize. I happen to have an extra, unread copy of Stephen Bull’s most excellent A General Plague of Madness – The Civil Wars in Lancashire 1640-1660 – paperback, 500pp, with maps and illustrations. Highly recommended if, like me, you are interested in the “backwater” areas of the ECW.


Entries will be accepted up until 10th September, or September 10th if you prefer your dates the wrong way round. If there’s anything else I’ve forgotten to stipulate, please just make it up.

Friday, 30 August 2013

More ECW Odd-Bods

I've been doing a little more painting - specifically last night, while not watching the Tottenham game. Just a few odd figures which have been waiting around and were beginning to irritate me.

Here's some young chaps proposing to take out Lady Derby's chimney pots once and for all...


...and here's a Royalist general of Foot, with his horse and a minder. The general himself is one of the original Warrior ECW range - definitely not the current ones. Some of these earlier figures are small enough to fit with my 20mm armies.