Napoleonic & ECW wargaming, with a load of old Hooptedoodle on this & that
Sunday, 14 October 2012
ECW - High-Ups #2
More of the same - this time Hinton Hunt's Royalist general figure. Here you see Sir Michael Earnley telling his men exactly where he wants the picnic lunch set out.
I am very fond of this classic little casting - I always have been. There is something about the styling and the poise that always puts me in mind of Alec Guinness as Charles I in the Cromwell movie - I can almost hear that Prime of Miss Jean Brodie accent. As ever, I find the Hintons hard to paint well - items like shoulder belts are kind of implied rather than obvious in the casting - too subtle for me? - but this chap is pleasing.
Overall, I'm not sure. I have a few HH general officer figures to paint, including the Roundhead one in the helmet. The figures are nice enough, but maybe a little bland - it's a personal thing (as always), but I like my generals to be definite personalities. And then there's the thing with Marcus Hinton's little legs...
Good so far - the Higgins chap is next.
ECW - High-Ups #1
It's half term at my son's school, so we have some plans to get away, and spend a couple of days visiting Loch Ness and Culloden. The plans are a bit vague - well, not so much vague as flexible. Even people with no real experience of Scotland will realise that such activities as these are heavily dependant on the weather. The latest idea is that, since the short-term forecast is iffy, and - more specifically - since the recent deluge is likely to have reduced the entire Highland area to a vast bog, we will go later in the week.
I thought I would take advantage of the spare time by painting a couple of general officers for the ECW. Some serious work has gone into planning for the production of my units of foot and horse, and - predictably - the easier bits, the generals and the artillery, which can be picked off in odd moments, have fallen behind.
Since this is all new to me, the first few such figures are a bit of a learning exercise. I decided to produce one test figure from each of the 3 principal brands of figure - Les Higgins, Hinton Hunt and Kennington/SHQ. Further, for this first series I am going to mount each figure on the "correct" (i.e. the same) make of horse, just to get the idea. Later, the intention is to mix and match pretty freely in this respect.
The first figure is the SHQ one - this is a fairly routine cavalry officer from the range, but he paints up well as a High Up. So here is Sir William Brereton, looking suitably belligerent. SHQ are relatively modern castings, with crisp detail, and are easy to paint, though the horses can require a lot of cleaning up first. My experience with Kennington Napoleonics taught me that their figures vary within the range in both height and stature, and that some have overscale hands, but the ECW cavalry are a superior breed all round. They are a very acceptable size match with the older 20mm ranges, though the infantry are a little chunkier. The swords are a bit sturdier than Higgins' ones, but that is not a bad thing for wargames figures.
Quite pleased with this - spare time permitting, some more should appear shortly.
I thought I would take advantage of the spare time by painting a couple of general officers for the ECW. Some serious work has gone into planning for the production of my units of foot and horse, and - predictably - the easier bits, the generals and the artillery, which can be picked off in odd moments, have fallen behind.
Since this is all new to me, the first few such figures are a bit of a learning exercise. I decided to produce one test figure from each of the 3 principal brands of figure - Les Higgins, Hinton Hunt and Kennington/SHQ. Further, for this first series I am going to mount each figure on the "correct" (i.e. the same) make of horse, just to get the idea. Later, the intention is to mix and match pretty freely in this respect.
The first figure is the SHQ one - this is a fairly routine cavalry officer from the range, but he paints up well as a High Up. So here is Sir William Brereton, looking suitably belligerent. SHQ are relatively modern castings, with crisp detail, and are easy to paint, though the horses can require a lot of cleaning up first. My experience with Kennington Napoleonics taught me that their figures vary within the range in both height and stature, and that some have overscale hands, but the ECW cavalry are a superior breed all round. They are a very acceptable size match with the older 20mm ranges, though the infantry are a little chunkier. The swords are a bit sturdier than Higgins' ones, but that is not a bad thing for wargames figures.
Quite pleased with this - spare time permitting, some more should appear shortly.
Thursday, 11 October 2012
ECW - They Called Her Babylon
Once again, I am grateful to Iain Mac, who is currently
operating this blog by remote control. Iain very kindly pointed me towards this
clip of Steel-Eye Span performing They
Called Her Babylon, which is a song about the self-same siege of Lathom
House which I referred to in the comments to the previous post. The heroine of
the piece is Lady Derby, a large French lady of terrifyingly feisty spirit, who
was resident in the house during the "Leaguer" and showed herself to be a much stronger character
than her absent husband. Lathom House is believed to have stood on the site of
the Pilkington works near Ormskirk . There is
a little poetic licence in the lyric – the defenders did a stout job, no doubt,
but the siege failed mostly because of lack of ordnance and suboptimal
application on the part of the parliament boys, who retired rather gratefully when
it was heard that Rupert was on his way to relieve the siege.
Charlotte Stanley, Countess of Derby
(1599–1664), born Charlotte de La
Trémoille
Lady Derby is a noble member of that legion of strong-minded
ladies over the centuries – from Boudicca to Margaret Thatcher – who must be
largely responsible for the amount of time men spend in potting sheds, or
playing darts in the local pub. Or walking in the hills. Or wargaming.
Also following on from the previous comments, on the subject
of hardship inflicted on non-combatants, here is a piece on exactly that
subject. This is lifted, humbly but without apology, from Dr Stephen Bull’s
fine A General Plague of Madness – TheCivil Wars in Lancashire 1640-1660 – it is
a great book – I recommend you buy it if you have any interest in the period.
Rupert left Oxford at the head of some
cavalry on 5 May 1644. At Shrewsbury
he was joined by about 8000 horse and foot, including an Irish contingent under
Henry Tillier. On 16 May the royalist army advanced northwards, making first
for Whitchurch, as one parliamentarian account noted, ‘plundering most
fearfully all along, and especially taking men and horses’. Some Cheshire men
who gave up their goods and animals to Rupert were doubly cursed, being
royalist supporters already forced to hand over much of their property to
parliament. William Davenport of Bramhall was a particularly good example of
this double jeopardy. Part of Sir William Brereton’s [parliament] cavalry had
visited him in early 1643, taking away not only eight muskets, eight sets of
pikeman’s armour but other equipment to the value of £40, plus £7 in cash.
Thereafter he had to make regular payments to help support the Nantwich
garrison and various ‘loans’. On New Years Day 1644 Captain Francis Duckenfield
and other parliament men had returned to clear out most of his horses, and
various other things including a drum. Then, five months later, Rupert’s army
came as something of a final insult:
‘...by whom I lost
better than a hundred pounds in linens and other goods at Milesend, besides the
rifling and pulling in pieces of my house. By them and my Lord Goring’s army I
lost eight horses, and besides victuals and other provision they ate me three
score bushels of oats. No sooner was the Prince gone but Stanley’s cornet, one
Lely, and twenty of his troop hastened their return to plunder me of my horses
which the Prince had left me.’
Parliamentary
sequestrators would come again just a couple of months later.
In case you think you are having a bad time this year, please spare a thought for William Davenport.
In case you think you are having a bad time this year, please spare a thought for William Davenport.
Wednesday, 10 October 2012
ECW - The Study of Up North
As my ECW armies gain a little momentum, the homework continues. Starting from a position of pretty all-encompassing ignorance, I am getting up to speed a little on the history of the wars in my chosen (backwater?) theatre of Lancashire (spreading a little into Cheshire, North Wales, Yorkshire and Cumberland). I am enjoying the books I have to hand, which have all been interesting and useful.
The pick of the bunch - and this is no criticism of the rest, is Stephen Bull's super A General Plague of Madness - The Civil Wars in Lancashire 1640-1660. This is one of the very best history books of any type I have read for a while - it is informative at all sorts of levels, copiously (and relevantly) illustrated, relatively free of axes grinding (Dr Bull manages to embrace new knowledge without any unseemly point-scoring against earlier writers) and - wonder of wonders - it is beautifully written. For those of us who find the stylistic differences between CV Wedgwood (for example) and some of the Osprey brigade (for example) a bit uncomfortable, here is a welcome ray of sunshine. Wholeheartedly recommended.
While Googling some obscure aspect of the Civil War recently, I stumbled across a wargame blog devoted to the war in exactly the same area as the one I have decided to focus on. In my fumbling excitement, I failed to bookmark it properly, and now I can't find it again. This weekend, one of my projects will be to find it - if anyone has any clues, I'd be delighted to hear from you.
Sunday, 7 October 2012
ECW - Snip Snip
Very short post this afternoon. I thought I would come clean about another instance of an unspeakable practice - converting Hinton Hunt figures. The particular case in point is the ECW standard bearer.
I have never really cared for HH standard bearers with their cast flags - it's a personal thing. Mostly this is because I am not a good enough painter to paint a pleasing flag (I had some disastrous, embarrassing failures with ACW Union flags in my formative years), but it's also because the figure is very top-heavy, and has an inconveniently extended base, which impacts on unit spacings. So I snips em, don't I?
I remove the flag, shorten his base, clean up his shoulder and remodel the brim of his hat (the cast flag is integral with the hat), then drill out the bearer's hand and superglue a metal pole in place and the job is done. I've done this enough times now to be getting comfortable and quick with it, and I'm pleased with the results (although it will certainly earn me black marks in the Great Book of Hinton).
The example shown here is the Royalist CEW2, before and after, but the procedure is exactly the same for the Parliamentarian REW2. All complaints to Chateau Foy, please, on used £10 notes.
Hooptedoodle #67 - Hardboard
Once, years ago, when I was both more stupid and more
vigorous than I am now, I decided to make a large, wall-mounted display cabinet
with sliding glass doors. It was not going to be a top-quality job, but it was
probably a brave effort.
My cabinet needed a hardboard back, and it was important
that this back board should be accurately cut and have clean edges. Hardboard
was regularly used in those days to do the jobs that thin MDF sheet does now,
and it was awful stuff to cut cleanly. I really did not fancy my chances of
making a decent job of the back board with the Stone Age tools I had available
– this one-piece backboard was going to be around five feet wide and about
3-and-a-half feet high. You may, if you wish, share the vision I had of trying
to measure and cut a flexible board of this size with a hand saw, supported on
a row of dining chairs or something equally useless.
I had a great idea, though. I phoned up my local DIY store,
and spoke to a very nice girl, who promised that they would cut a sheet to the
exact dimensions I specified, with perfect right-angle corners and crisp edges,
and would deliver it to my house in a few days. Excellent. My measurements,
needless to say, were correct to a sixteenth of an inch, and the girl took a careful
note of them and read them back to me. She explained to me that they had
recently started doing all measurements in millimetres, but there was no
problem, since they would simply convert my exact measurements and everything
would be fine. I paid by credit card, arranged for the item to be left with a
neighbour, and quietly congratulated myself on having removed one major
headache from the job.
Later the same week, my elderly neighbour reported that he had received a large item addressed to me, and there it was – packed around the edges with padding, and looking really good. Secure in the knowledge that the back board was all ready to be fixed on, I cracked on with the cabinet, but when the time came to add the back, I was horrified to find it was a few millimetres big in both directions. I checked everything – they had cut it perfectly, but it was a little too big.
I got to bed that night about 4 a.m., having trimmed the
board and faked up the two new edges as best I could. It was not really very
good – I arranged to have the more ragged edges at the top and near the corner
of the room, but I would always know they were there. You know how it is? –
something else to gnaw away at you forever – another little failure...
I phoned the store, and got the same girl, who remembered me
very clearly (I would rather not think about just why she remembered me). She
found the spec sheet, with the exact measurements, and could not understand
what had gone wrong.
“They would have converted your measurements exactly, but we
always round to the higher centimetre, to be on the safe side.”
I was dumbstruck by this last piece of information, and
asked why they did this, and she said,
“Company policy – it’s what our customers want – and,
anyway, all items measured in metric are always bigger.”
This should have some upsides, you would think – petrol
bought in litres should give you more in the tank (though of course the
kilometre journeys would be longer – hmmm...), metric cans of beer should
quench a bigger thirst and so on. In fact, some rounding is a sensible thing to
do – I recall visiting Cork
in the 1980s and being very impressed that they had erected some smart new
European signs advising motorists that the speed limit in town was now 48 kph –
the metric equivalent of the old speed limit of 30 mph.
I digress. The cabinet was finished, though I never quite
forgave it. It developed another problem over the years, since the weight of
the glass doors gradually pulled it a little out of shape, and the doors did
not shut properly. Eventually I dismantled it and put it in a public rubbish
tip, and I felt somehow cleansed when it was gone.
But I have never forgotten that metric items are always bigger. There are occasions in one’s life when a sudden light-bulb of understanding turns on, and I believe that we have to embrace these moments when they arrive.
Saturday, 6 October 2012
Give-away - Almost Nothing for Nothing
I’m in the process of trying to tidy up my den/office, and
there’s a wad of old Historex Napoleonic uniform information sheets that I keep
coming up against – mostly French – dating from the 1970s. This is a left-over from
my recent loft-clearing activities in East Kilbride ,
to raise money on eBay for Cancer Research. I keep promising myself I’ll throw
them out, but somehow it seems a shame to do this.
There’s nothing particularly rare in this lot, but there’s plenty
of it, and Historex are legendary for being correct. If you are interested,
please leave a comment with contact details (tell me if you don’t want it
published), or email me through my Blogger profile. Depending on the size of
the response, I’ll devise some fiendish system for choosing a recipient, and will mail it to the lucky volunteer/winner. The
desirable object on offer is a stack of A4 sheets folded in half, which is about
1 inch thick and weighs around 450 gm. It is also a little faded, and smells a
bit – how Old School do you want, anyway?
It may as well go in your dustbin as mine. If there is no response at all, of course, I shall pretend that someone emailed me.
Late edit - I was asked for a sample picture - here you go...
Late late edit - thanks to Hugh, Benjamin, Allen, Marco P, The Red Fox(?) and Mossmorran for your interest - I rolled a six-sided die, and Hugh wins - I'll get the envelope away to Maverick Collecting. No doubt there will be more exciting chuck-out offers coming up, so stay tuned!
Late edit - I was asked for a sample picture - here you go...
Late late edit - thanks to Hugh, Benjamin, Allen, Marco P, The Red Fox(?) and Mossmorran for your interest - I rolled a six-sided die, and Hugh wins - I'll get the envelope away to Maverick Collecting. No doubt there will be more exciting chuck-out offers coming up, so stay tuned!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)












